celebrate his daughter viz., Ambigavathi's marriage, who was a minor at that point of time and it is further noted that the parties had agreed that after the demise of Ramasamy, items 12, 13 and 14 of the "A" schedule properties should be acquired by Ambiga absolutely as the full owner. Subsequently, there is a recital in the compromise that the remaining properties should be taken by Ramasamy and Pavadai's son absolutely. If really the parties had intended to allot items 1 to 11 of the "A" schedule properties to the son of Pavadai absolutely along with Ramasamy, necessary recitals pointing to the same would have been incorporated in clause - 2 of the compromise, wherein, the items 1 to 11 of the "A" schedule properties had been declared to be allotted to Ramasamy absolutely and when in clause - 3, there is no specific mention of the items 1 to 11 of the "A" schedule properties and when clause - 3 deals only with the items 12 to 14 of "A" schedule, from the word "ghf;fp brhj;ij" found in clause - 3, the contention put forth by the plaintiff that it also includes the items 1 to 11 of the "A" schedule properties, as such, cannot be accepted. If the intention of the parties to the compromise is to allot the items 1 to 11 of the "A" schedule properties absolutely to Ramasamy and the son of Pavadai, necessary recitals pointing to the same would have been incorporated in clause - 2 of the compromise and on the other hand, when
