Sundarammal v. R.Shanmugam
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the Second Appeal as infructuous because the matter had already been settled out of court via a representation by the respondent's counsel regarding the surrender of possession.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal dismissed for having become infructuous. No costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 08.10.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA
Sundarammal ... Appellant
Vs.
R.Shanmugam ... Respondent
PRAYER : This Second Appeal filed under Section 100 C.P.C., against the judgement and decree dated 14.08.2009 passed in A.S.No.15 of 2009 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Gobichettipalayam, Erode District confirming the judgement and decree passed in O.S.No.149 of 2005 dated 14.03.2008 by the District Munsif Court, Sathyamangalam, Erode District.
JUDGEMENT
(Heard through video conferencing)
This Second Appeal is filed to set aside the judgement and decree dated 14.08.2009 passed in A.S.No.15 of 2009 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Gobichettipalayam, Erode District confirming the judgement and decree passed in O.S.No.149 of 2005 dated 14.03.2008 by the District Munsif Court, Sathyamangalam, Erode District.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sundarammal
- respondent
R.Shanmugam
Coram
R.N. MANJULA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court