V.Nivedha v. Senthamarai
Case brief
What is this about?
The Single Appellate Court dismissed a second appeal filed under Section 100 CPC as withdrawn by the appellant's counsel, noting a formal endorsement to that effect in the record.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal dismissed as withdrawn; connected C.M.P. closed. No costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.12.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
S.A.NO.828 OF 2015 AND C.M.P.NO.3175 OF 2017
V.Nivedha ... Appellant/Appellant/ 2nd Defendant
.Vs. 1. Senthamarai ... 1st Respondent/1st Respondent/ Plaintiff 2. Ponmozhi Nangai 3. V.Rajalakshmi ... Respondents 2 & 3/ Respondents 2 & 3/ Defendants 1 & 3
PRAYER:-
The Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the Judgment and Decree dated 14.11.2014 made in A.S.No.27 of 2014 on the file of the III Additional District and Sessions Court, Salem, confirming the judgment and decree dated 14.09.2013 made in O.S.No.121 of 2009 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Salem.
For Appellant : Mr.Harish For Mr.N.Manokaran For R2 : Mr.M.Viswanathan For R3 : Mr.P.Jagadeesan For R4&R5 : Mr.D.Shivakumaran
Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this court to withdraw this second appeal. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Nivedha
- respondent
Senthamarai
- respondent
Ponmozhi Nangai
- respondent
V. Rajalakshmi
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court