Partly allowed

Palanisamy v. Veerakkal @ Sakunthala

Madras HC9 Nov 2021SA/814/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Second Appeal filed by Palanisamy against a confirming second appeal judgment was declared infructuous and dismissed. The court noted that a final decree was passed and possession handed over to the parties pending the appeal, leaving no matter for adjudication.

What did the court decide?

Second Appeal dismissed as infructuous; no order as to costs; connected miscellaneous petition closed.

Palanisamy Vs Veerakkal @ Sakunthala — Property and Title | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 09.11.2021

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ

¶5

S.A.No.814 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.15423 of 2016

¶6

Palanisamy

¶7

Vs.

¶8

Veerakkal @ Sakunthala

¶9

Muthukumar @ Saravana Kumar ... Respondents

¶10

PRAYER: The Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 17.06.2016 made in A.S.No.5 of 2016 on the file of the III Additional District and Sessions Court, Gobichettipalayam confirming the judgment and decree dated 09.12.2013 made in O.S.No.60 of 2011 on the file of the Sub Court, Sathyamangalam.

¶11

For Appellant : M/s.Zeenath Begum

¶12

For Respondents : M/s.Ma.P.Thangavel

¶13

J U D G M E N T

¶14

The present Second Appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 17.06.2016 made in A.S.No.5 of 2016 on the file of the III Additional District and Sessions Court, Gobichettipalayam confirming the judgment and decree dated 09.12.2013 made in O.S.No.60 of 2011 on the file of the Sub Court, Sathyamangalam.

¶15

Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for both the sides submit that pending Second Appeal, a final decree was passed and possession was handed over to the parties concerned. Hence, nothing survives for further adjudication in this matter.

¶16

Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

both sides, the Second Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶19

Sd/-

¶20

Assistant Registrar(CS-III)

¶21

//True Copy//

¶22

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶23

asi

¶24

¶25

The III Additional District and Sessions Court, Gobichettipalayam.

¶26

The Sub Court, Sathyamangalam.

¶27

+1cc to M/s.Ma.P.Thangavel, Advocate, S.R.No.57956

¶28

S.A.No.814 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.15423 of 2016

¶29

RLD(CO) SU(22/11/2021)

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Palanisamy v. Veerakkal @ Sakunthala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Palanisamy v. Veerakkal @ Sakunthala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ulaganathan (Deceased) Vs Ambujam

R.Ganesan Vs Yagu

A.P.Suryaprakasam Vs The Union of India

Government of Tamilnadu, Vs K.S.D.Rajendran, (Died)

K.P.Krishna Pillai Vs E.Rajendran

D.Augustine Vs Mahaveer Plantations Pvt. Ltd.