Chinnathambi v. Marimuthu
Case brief
What is this about?
The Second Appeal filed under Section 100 CPC was dismissed for default as neither the appellant nor the respondents appeared before the High Court on the listed dates.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal stands dismissed for default. No costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 29.11.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
S.A.NO.637 OF 2012
Chinnathambi ... Appellant/Plaintiff
Vs.
1.Marimuthu 2.Anbalagan 3.Senthilkumar 4.Natarajan 5.Arunachalam ... Respondents/Defendants
PRAYER:
This Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of CPC against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.43 of 2010, by the Sub-Court, Chidambaram, dated 21.10.2011, confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.16 of 2008, by the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Parangipettai, dated 08.09.2010. For Appellant : No appearance For Respondents : No appearance
JUDGMENT
When the matter was listed on 15.11.2021, there was no representation for the appellant and hence, the matter was directed to be posted to 26.11.2021, under the caption 'for dismissal'.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Chinnathambi
- respondent
1. Marimuthu
- respondent
2. Anbalagan
- respondent
3. Senthilkumar
- respondent
4. Natarajan
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court