S.Varadaraju v. Muthusamy
Case brief
What is this about?
In this second appeal, the appellant sought permission to withdraw the appeal through video conference. The High Court dismissed the Second Appeal as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
The Second Appeal stood dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 06.08.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ
S.A.No.448 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014
S.Varadaraju
S/o.Sundaram ... Appellant
Vs.
Muthusamy S/o.Nachimuthu Gounder ... Respondent
PRAYER: The Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of C.P.C. against the Decree and Judgment of the Sub Court, Namakkal dated 09.02.2010 passed in A.S.No.81 of 2006 reversing the Judgment and Decree of the Principal District Munsif Court, Namakkal, dated 21.09.2004 in O.S.No.241 of 2004.
(This case has been heard through video conference)
The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant seeks permission of this court to withdraw this second appeal through video conference.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
S. Varadaraju
- respondent
Muthusamy
Coram
M. Govindaraj
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court