Disposed
Subbulakshmi v. v.Ponmani
Madras HCSA/401/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
S.A.No.401 of 2012 M.GOVINDARAJ, J. The…
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
¶1
S.A.No.401 of 2012
¶2
S.A.No.401 of 2012
¶3
M.GOVINDARAJ, J.
¶4
The matter is listed today under the caption “for being mentioned”.
¶5
Learned Senior Counsel
¶6
appearing for the appellant would submit that directions were wrongly mentioned in the judgment dated 25.08.2021 and therefore she seeks a correction.
¶7
- Accordingly, Sub Para (i) of para 11 is corrected as under:
¶8
“(i) The Plaintiffs/respondents are entitled to the extent mentioned in S.No.983/3 in Ex.B5 viz., 9.0 meters East West on the Northern and Southern side, 5.8 meters in the Western side and 6.0 meters on the Eastern side.”
¶9
- Registry is directed to carry out the above mentioned corrections in the judgment and issue a fresh judgment copy.
¶10
23.09.2021
¶11
Kpr
Coram
AI extract
M.GOVINDARAJ, J.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court