8.The plaintiff claims title to the suit property based on Exs.A1 to A3. According to the plaintiff, the suit property ie., the plaint B schedule property forms part of the plaint A schedule property and the plaint B schedule property is measuring 37 feet east-west, 2 feet north-south, totally 74 sq.feet and according to the plaintiff, the entire property comprised in the suit survey number originally belonged to Sivalinga Mudaliar and he plotted out the property and alienated the same to various persons and accordingly putforth the case that the plaint A schedule property had been sold by Sivalinga Mudaliar to one Veerasamy Mudaliar under Ex.A1 sale deed and subsequently Veerasamy Mudaliar had alienated the plaint A schedule property to the plaintiff's grandfather Vadivel Mudaliar under Ex.A2 sale deed and in turn, Vadivel Mudaliar had executed the settlement deed qua the plaint A schedule property in favour of the minor plaintiff under Ex.A3 settlement deed. Thus according to the plaintiff, he has the valid title, possession and enjoyment of the plaint A schedule property and as already pointed out, as according to the plaintiff, the plaint B schedule property also forms part of the plaint A schedule property, put forth the case that the suit property ie., the plaint B schedule property is in his possession and enjoyment and it is he who has the valid title to the same.
