Chinnusamy v. Marayammal
Case brief
What is this about?
The Second Appeal filed by Chinnusamy was dismissed as abated because the sole appellant had died and no steps were taken to continue the proceedings.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 04.08.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ
S.A.No.284 of 2015
Chinnusamy ...Appellant
Vs.
Marayammal ...Respondent
PRAYER: The Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 31.10.2014 made in A.S.No.68 of 2012 on the file of the Sub Court, Namakkal, reversing the judgment ad decree dated 15.06.2012 made in O.S.No.497 of 2008 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Namakkal.
The present Second Appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 31.10.2014 made in A.S.No.68 of 2012 on the file of the Sub Court, Namakkal, reversing the judgment ad decree dated 15.06.2012 made in O.S.No.497 of 2008 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Namakkal.
- Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the sole appellant died and no steps were taken till date.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Chinnusamy
- respondent
Marayammal
Coram
M.Govindaraj
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court