Rajan v. T.Radhika
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court dismissed two second appeals under Section 100 CPC for non-prosecution. Due to the appellant's absence and lack of representation, despite the matter being listed for dismissal, the Court exercised its discretion to dismiss the appeals without costs.
What did the court decide?
Dismissal of second appeals for non-prosecution; closure of connected miscellaneous petition.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 15.07.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR
S.A.NOS.163 & 164 OF 2017 AND C.M.P.NO.3329 OF 2017
Rajan
... Appellantin both Second Appeal
Versus
- T.Radhika
- Thirumappa Gowder
- Subbyan
- Kariappan
- Natarajan 6. Duraisamy
- Devirammal
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether second appeals should be dismissed for non-prosecution when the appellant fails to appear.
What relief follows the dismissal of appeals due to non-prosecution.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Rajan
- respondent
T.Radhika
- respondent
Thirumappa Gowder
- respondent
Subbyan
- respondent
Kariappan
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court