A.Ethiraj v. R.Munusamy
Case brief
What is this about?
In a second appeal regarding succession/inheritance, the court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution as the appellant failed to bring legal representatives of deceased respondents on record despite multiple opportunities.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution with no costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 20.07.2021
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
SA No.1269 of 2007
A. Ethiraj
- R. Munusamy 2. Kamaraj 3. Nehru 4. Babuji
... Appellant/1 st Appellant/Defendant versus ... Respondents/2nd Appellant 2 to 4/ Defendant 2 to 4
Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 28.07.2006 and made in A.S. No.61 of 2005 on the file of the learned Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruvannamalai confirming the judgment and decree dated 29.09.2004 and made in O.S. No.74 of 2001 on the file of the learned Additional District Munsif Judge.
For Appellant : Mr.G.Rajan
For Respondents : M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates for R4 R1 to R3 - Served - No appearance
Parties & counsel
- appellant
A. Ethiraj and others
- respondent
Respondents 2 to 4
Coram
Abdul Qudhose
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court