G.Rethinam v. N.Marthivanan
Case brief
What is this about?
The Second Appeal filed under Section 100 CPC was dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant was absent and showed no interest in prosecuting the appeal filed in 2009.
What did the court decide?
The Second Appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 17.08.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA
S.A. No.1079 of 2009 and MP.No.1 of 2009
G.Rethinam ...Appellant
Vs.
1.N.Mathivanan 2.N.Chandrasekaran 3.N.Pandiyan 4.N.Elangovan 5.N.Vasantha 6.M.Devika ...Respondents
PRAYER : The Second Appeal filed under Section 100 C.P.C., against the decree and Judgement dated 20.04.2009 on the file of the Sub Court, Mannargudi in A.S.No.38 of 2008 reversing the Judgement dated 12.08.2008 in O.S.No.19 of 2005 on the file of District Munsif Court, Mannargudi.
For Respondents : Mr.S.Chandrasekaran
JUDGEMENT
(Heard through video conferencing)
Parties & counsel
- appellant
G.Rethinam
- respondent
1.N.Mathivanan
- respondent
2.N.Chandrasekaran
- respondent
3.N.Pandiyan
- respondent
4.N.Elangovan
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court