The High Court of Madras dismissed a review petition filed under Order 47 Rule 1 read with 114 CPC. The Court found the petition lacked merit, noting the petitioner repeatedly used review petitions to protract proceedings and was in the habit of blaming counsel without cause.
The review petition is dismissed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 04.10.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
Review Petition No.105 of 2021
in
CMP No.749 of 2021
in
A.S.(SR) No.82715 of 2020
1.A.S.Sasikala
2.A.R.Subash .. Petitioners
..vs.
M.Gopi ...Respondent
Prayer: Review petition filed under Order 47 Rule 1 read with 114 of CPC to review the order dated 01.02.2021 in CMP No.749 of 2021 in A.S.(SR) No.82715 of 2020.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Munuraj
O R D E R
Heard the learned counsel for the review petitioner.
petitioner counsel perused. This Court finds that there is no merit in this
1/2
DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J.
VRI
review petition. The petitioner herein wants to protract the proceedings
through this review petition. The order of this Court in earlier
proceedings dated 29.09.2020 passed in C.R.P No.2797 of 2018 and the
order sought to reviewed speaks volumes about the conduct of the review
petitioner herein. She whenever lost her petition in the habit of blaming
her counsel without any compulsion. Hence, the review petition is
dismissed. No costs.
04.10.2021
vri
Review Petition No.105 of 2021
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the review petition which is filed to protract proceedings ought to be allowed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A.S. Sasikala
A.R. Subash
M. Gopi
G. Jayachandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
