Disposed

T.v.Sundaram Iyengar and Sons Pvt. Ltd, v. Mr.M.Suresh, Proprietor,M/s. Samvrooms Automotives

Madras HC22 Mar 2021OP/78/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order appoints Mr. Justice K. Ravichandra Babu as a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes between the petitioner and respondent. The petition invoked Section 11, and both parties concurred in submitting to arbitration.

What did the court decide?

Appointment of K. Ravichandra Babu, Retd.HC Judge, M.A. as Sole Arbitrator on terms of fees borne equally by parties and to render award within six months.

T.v.Sundaram Iyengar and Sons Pvt. Ltd, Vs Mr.M.Suresh… — Arbitration | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

Arb. O.P. (Com. Div.) No. 78 of 2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 12.08.2021

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR

¶6

Arb. O.P. (Com. Div.) No.78 of 2021

¶7

B.L.Kashyap & Sons Ltd., having registered office at No.409, 4^th Floor, DLF Tower, New Delhi – 110 025 Also having its branch office at 4^th Floor, West Wing, Soul Space Paradigm, Near Innovative Multiplex, Outer Ring Road, Marathahalli, Bangalore-560 037. ... Petitioner Vs. M/s. Akshaya Private Limited, G-square, 4^th Floor, No.46, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Kandanchavadi, Chennai-600 096. ... Respondent PRAYER : Original Petition filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and as amended in Arbitration and Conciliation

¶8

1 of 4

¶9

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶10

Arb. O.P. (Com. Div.) No. 78 of 2021

¶11

(Amendment) Act, 2015, to appoint a Sole Arbitrator on behalf of the parties in accordance with Clause 58.1 of the Contract dated 15.03.2013, Clause

¶12

58.1 of the revised Contract dated 30.03.2018, Clause 57.1 of Contract dated 07.04.2018 and Clause 57.1 of the Contract dated 25.03.2019 entered

¶13

between the petitioner and the respondent.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.S.R. Raghunathan for
M/s. Ramasubramaniam Raja
For Respondent : Mr.Mani Sundar Gopal
O R D E R
(This case has been heard through video conference)
This Original Petition has been filed seeking appointment of Sole
Arbitrator to resolve the dispute that has arisen between the petitioner and the
respondent.

¶15

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the
respondent through video conferencing.

¶16

2 of 4

¶17

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶18

Arb. O.P. (Com. Div.) No. 78 of 2021

¶19

The learned counsel appearing for petitioner would submit that

¶20

totally, there are three contracts entered into between parties dated 15.03.2013, 07.04.2018 and 25.03.2019 and subsequently, there was a revised contract entered into between the parties dated 30.03.2018. It appears

¶21

that all the contracts are relating to same project, and on perusal of the contracts executed between the parties, makes it clear that if the dispute arise between the parties, the parties are subject to arbitration and the agreement is

¶22

binding on the parties to refer the dispute. Hence, the present Original

¶23

Petition has been filed for appointment of Sole Arbitrator.

¶24

The learned counsel appearing for respondent has no objection for

¶25

appointment of Sole Arbitrator to resolve the dispute arisen between the parties.

¶26

In such view of the matter, as both sides have no objection for

¶27

referring the matter for arbitration and taking note of the nature of contract and the dispute arose between the parties, it is ordered as follows :-

¶28

3 of 4

¶29

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶30

Arb. O.P. (Com. Div.) No. 78 of 2021

¶31

i) Honourable Mr. Justice K.RAVICHANDRA BABU,

¶32

Judge (Retired) High Court, Madras, residing at ID Cresent Castle, 13/6, II Cresant Park Road, Gandhi Nagar, Adyar, Chennai-600 020, Contact Nos.94980 33336 and 94440 11433

¶33

is appointed as the Arbitrator to enter upon reference and

¶34

adjudicate the disputes inter se the parties.

¶35

ii] That the learned Arbitrator appointed herein, shall

¶36

after issuing notice to the parties and upon hearing them, pass an award as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of the Order.

¶37

iii] That the learned Sole Arbitrator appointed herein shall

¶38

be paid fees and other incidental charges, fixed by him and the

¶39

same shall be borne by the parties equally.

¶40

4 of 4

¶41

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶42

Arb. O.P. (Com. Div.) No. 78 of 2021

¶43

This Original Petition is ordered accordingly, leaving the parties to

¶44

bear their own costs.

¶45

12.08.2021
rpp
To
Honourable Mr. Justice K.RAVICHANDRA BABU,
Judge (Retired) High Court, Madras
ID Cresent Castle, 13/6,
II Cresant Park Road,
Gandhi Nagar,
Adyar, Chennai-600 020.
Contact Nos.94980 33336 and
94440 11433

¶46

5 of 4

¶47

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶48

Arb. O.P. (Com. Div.) No. 78 of 2021

¶49

N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.

¶50

rpp

¶51

Arb. O.P.(Com. Div.)
No. 78 of 2021
12.08.2021

¶52

6 of 4

¶53

http://www.judis.nic.in

T.v.Sundaram Iyengar and Sons Pvt. Ltd, v. Mr.M.Suresh, Proprietor,M/s. Samvrooms Automotives

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.v.Sundaram Iyengar and Sons Pvt. Ltd, v. Mr.M.Suresh, Proprietor,M/s. Samvrooms Automotives

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Ravindran Vs K.Devendran (Decd.)

K.Mahendran Vs Mr.K.Dhanalakshmi and Another

M/s Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Co., Ltd. Vs Mrs.Chhaya Santosh Nikalaje and 2 others

S.Sakthivel Vs Abirami kalyanasundaram

Emi Infratructure Private Limited Vs Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd.

M/s Daimler Financial Services India Pvt. Ltd, Represented by its authorised signatory Vs M/s. Salabham Travels, Represented by its Managing Partner, Mr.Maneesh