The petitioner filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arbitrator but subsequently withdrew the petition, resulting in its dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
O.P.No.430 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.02.2021
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA
Original Petition No.430 of 2020
M/s.EDAC Engineering Limited
Represented by its Legal Officer
Mr.V.Balaji Pathak,
No.88, Mount Road,
Guindy, Chennai – 600 032.
... Petitioner
Versus
M/s.Kirloskar Corrocoat Pvt. Ltd.,
represented by its company secretary
Mr.AnujaLatukar
Udyog Bhavan, Tilak Road,
Pune – 411 002.
... Respondent
Prayer : Original Petition filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to appoint a Sole Arbitrator to decide the dispute/ claim between the petitioner and the respondent in accordance with clause 17 of the Purchase order dated 02.03.2017.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Aravind Subramaniam For Respondent : Mr.S.Venkatesan
O.P.No.430 of 2020
P.T.ASHA,J.
dsa
O R D E R
The petitioner has filed this petition u/s.11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to appoint a Sole Arbitrator to decide the dispute/ claim between the petitioner and the respondent in accordance with clause 17 of the Purchase order dated 02.03.2017.
Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
11.02.2021
Speaking Order / Non-speaking Order Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes dsa
O.P. No.430 of 2020
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. EDAC Engineering Limited
M/s. Kirloskar Corrocoat Pvt. Ltd.
P.T. Asha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
