Allowed

M/s.Balaji Incon Solution, Rep.by proprietor, v. Mr.R.Baskar

Madras HC8 Oct 2021OP/365/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to adjudicate disputes between the petitioner and respondents regarding a Hire Purchase Agreement. The court ordered the arbitrator to decide within six months and fixed the costs equally. It closed an earlier Section 9 application.

What did the court decide?

Appointment of a fresh sole arbitrator; direction to pass award within six months; equal bearing of fees; closure of Section 9 application.

M/s.Balaji Incon Solution, Rep.by proprietor, Vs Mr.R.Baskar — Arbitration | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

O.P.No.365 of 2021

¶2

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Date 02.09.2021

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR

¶6

O.P.No.365 of 2021 & A.No.1529 of 2020

¶7

M/s.Galada Finance Ltd., Rep. by its Manager, Mr.G.Ramesh Having registered Office at 'Shanthi Sadan' Old No.4, New No.7, Shafee Mohammed Road, Thousand Lights, Chennai – 600 006. . . . Petitioner Versus 1. Mr.A.Rajender 2. Mrs.B.Bharathy 3. Mr.K.Ganesh . . . Respondents

¶8

PRAYER : Petition filed under Order Section 11 [4] [5] of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to appoint an arbitrator to redress the disputes between the petitioner and the respondents herein as per the terms of the Hire Purchase Agreement date 13.12.2010, under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

¶9

For petitioner : Ms.Vijalakshmi For respondents : Ms.Nisha for Mr.S.Ramajayam No appearance – R1 & R2

¶10

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

1/4

O.P.No.365 of 2021

O R D E R

This application has been filed for appointment of a fresh arbitrator in a

¶15

dispute arose between the parties in respect of a Hire Purchase Agreement on 13.12.2010. The award passed by the previous arbitrator has been set aside by this Court.

¶16

The parties are governed by the clauses in the agreement and clause 15 of

¶17

agreement provides for reference of the dispute to the arbitrator.

¶18

Accordingly, with the consent of both sides, it is ordered as follows:

¶19

to enter upon reference and adjudicate the matter.

¶20

ii] That the learned Arbitrator appointed herein, shall after issuing notice to the parties and upon hearing them, pass

¶21

an award as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a

¶22

period of six months from the date of receipt of the Order.

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

¶24

2/4

¶25

O.P.No.365 of 2021

¶26

iii] That the learned Sole Arbitrator appointed herein

¶27

shall fix his fees and other incidental charges and the same shall

¶28

be borne by the parties equally.

¶29

4 . This Original Petition is ordered accordingly, leaving the parties to bear their own costs. As far as the application in A.No.1529 of 2020 filed under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act is concerned, since an artbitrator has been appointed in the Original Petition, the applicant can move before the arbitrator for any interim relief under section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, no further Order is required in this applicant and the application is closed.

¶30

02.09.2021

¶31

Index : Yes / No Internet: Yes Speaking/non speaking order

¶32

vrc

¶33

To Mr.S.Arjun Suresh, Advocate, New No.54, 3^rd Main Road, Gandhi Nagar, Adyar, Chennai – 600 020. Mobile No.9789971118

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

¶35

3/4

¶36

O.P.No.365 of 2021

¶37

N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.

¶38

vrc

¶39

order in:
O.P.No.365 of 2021

¶40

02.09.2021

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/

¶42

4/4

M/s.Balaji Incon Solution, Rep.by proprietor, v. Mr.R.Baskar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s.Balaji Incon Solution, Rep.by proprietor, v. Mr.R.Baskar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr.Praveen Reddy Charuku Vs M/s.Ggs Information services Inc. and 2 others

C. Sathyanarayana Vs Sri Ram Vedam

M/S.Ador Welding Ltd. Vs Mse Facilitation Council

M/s.Vgp Universal Kingdom Vs M/s K.K Enterprises

M/s.Sekar Stores Homemart Vs M/s.Reliance Capital Limited

India Growth Fund through Vs M.Thiagarajan