The High Court ordered the closure of an interim relief application without adjudicating on its merits, noting that the substantive issues would be resolved in the underlying suit after trial.
O.A.No.536 of 2020 ordered to be closed without going into the merits of the said application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
O.A.No.536 of 2020 in C.S.No.286 of 2020
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
Since issues have been framed in the suit and till date, no interim order has been granted in favour of the applicant / plaintiff in O.A.No.536 of 2020, wherein, the applicant / plaintiff had sought for an interim injunction restraining the respondents /defendants from converting the 6th and 7th floor of the schedule mentioned property into a boarding or lodging or service apartment, no useful purpose will be served, if this application is allowed to be kept pending. With regard to the merits of the contentions in the application, it can very well be decided in the suit after trial.
15.11.2021
srn
applicant / plaintiff
respondents /defendants
ABDUL QUDDHOSE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
