This brief order, part of O.A No 263 of 2021, confirms that no representation was filed by the respondent despite a name board change. The court made the interim order from April 28, 2021 absolute based on non-representation and supporting affidavits.
The interim order dated April 28, 2021 is made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
O.A.No.263 of 2021 in C.S(Comm.Div.).No.167 of 2021
DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.
Proof of service filed. There is no representation for the respondent. The plaintiff has filed an affidavit though the respondent has changed the name board from “Bismi Biriyani” to “Rahman Biriyani”, still they are using the logo and registered mobile number.
13.09.2021
rpl
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the interim order should be made absolute due to non-appearance of respondent?
Whether change of trade name and non-filing of reply constitutes non-representation?
Whether application for making interim order absolute was disposed of properly?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Applicant (Original Plaintiff)
Respndent
DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
