Disposed

Paramount Group Pvt. Ltd. v. Kerala Friends Welfare Association and another

Madras HC21 Sept 2021OA/237/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single Judge order closing an interim injunction application for construction dispute as the respondent provided a categoric undertaking in their counter, rendering further immediate orders unnecessary.

What did the court decide?

Interim order stands closed; matter posted for filing written statement; no specific injunction re-extended explicitly as prior one deemed sufficient by the undertaking.

Paramount Group Pvt. Ltd. Vs Kerala Friends… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

(ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION)

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN

O.A. No.237 of 2021

C.S. No.135 of 2021

Paramount Group Pvt. Ltd., Paramount Gardens, Arcot Road, Old Door No.13, New No.24 Ponniamman Koil Street, Saligramam Chennai 600 093.

¶10

... Applicant/Plaintiff

¶11

-Versus-

¶12

Kerala Friends' Welfare Association No.6, Parthasarathy Street, Arcot Road, Saligramam, Chennai 600 093.

¶13

The Commissioner Corporation of Chennai Rippon Building, Park Town, Chennai 600 003.

¶14

... Respondents/Defendants

¶15

Original Application praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ grant an order of interim injunction restraining the first Respondent, their

¶17

¶18

men, servants, agents or any one acting under them, from in any manner

¶19

proceeding with any further construction over the petitioner's property more

¶20

clearly described in the schedule A and B to the judges summons filed herewith, pending disposal of the present suit.

¶21

This original application coming on this day before this court for

¶22

hearing, the Court made the following order:

¶23

When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the applicant would draw the attention of this Court to paragraph No.4 of the counter filed on behalf of the first respondent and the same is extracted hereunder:

¶24

“4. I most humbly make it clear that the 1st respondent their men, servants, agents or anyone acting under the 1st respondent will not put up any construction whatsoever in the property described in Schedules A and B to the Judge's summons, pending disposal of the above suit.”

¶25

In view of the categoric statement made in the above paragraph of

¶26

the counter filed by the first respondent, the interim order passed in O.A.No.237 of 2021 stands closed as no furthers orders are necessary in the

¶27

said application.

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶29

¶30

Post the matter on 04.10.2021, for filing written statement.

¶31

Sd/-VPNJ

¶32

21.09.2021

¶33

// Certified to be true copy//

¶34

Dated at Madras this day of 2021.

¶35

Court Officer(O.S.)

¶36

From 25th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format. Jj 27/09/2021

¶37

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Paramount Group Pvt. Ltd. v. Kerala Friends Welfare Association and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Paramount Group Pvt. Ltd. v. Kerala Friends Welfare Association and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.G.Sekar Vs S.Jayalakshmi

D.Kishore Vs Nil

Elizabeth Solomon Vs Matthias Solomon

Mrs.K.Savithri and 2 others Vs Mr.Prakash Chand

D.Deepa Vs D.Varalakshmi

Senthil Kumar Premraj Vs Kathryn Premraj