The High Court ex-parte dismissed two original applications as inserted in the cause list. An interim order was extended and the filings were closed without further listing due to lack of representation.
The O.A.s are closed and dismissed ex-parte.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
O.A.Nos.17, 18 of 2021 in C.S.No.9 of 2021
O.A.Nos.17, 18 of 2021 in C.S.No.9 of 2021
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN J,
Registry has put up the notice forms in O.A.Nos.17, 18 of 2021 indicating that the notices has been served on the respondents. The original endorsement is also available. In view of the further fact, that the name and address of the respondent have been printed in the cause list and there is no representation, the said respondents are set exparte. 2. Interim Order already granted by this Court is extended until further orders and the two Original Applications need not be listed again and are closed. 16.03.2021 (1/3) rna
1/1
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
