Disposed

B.Jayanthi v. State Rep by

Madras HC28 Apr 2021HCP/498/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this petition filed under Article 226 for habeas corpus regarding a missing husband, the Court found that the husband was not in illegal custody. The Court directed the Assistant Commissioner of Police to monitor the registration of a missing person case and keep the petitioner informed.

What did the court decide?

The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Salem West, to monitor the investigation in Crime No.251 of 2021 and keep the petitioner informed; the husband to be produced before the appropriate Magistrate wh

B.Jayanthi Vs State Rep by — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED 28.04.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH AND THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE R.PONGIAPPAN

¶5

H.C.P. No.498 of 2021

¶6

B.Jayanthi Petitioner

¶7

Vs.
1 The Commissioner of Police
Salem Corporation
Salem Commissioner Office
Salem
2 The State represented by
Inspector of Police
Suramangalam Police Station
Salem 636 005 Respondents

¶8

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of habeas corpus directing the second respondent to produce the body of the petitioner's husband C.Baskaran, S/o.Chinnasamy, aged about 55 years, before this Court and set him at liberty.

¶9

For petitioner Mr.L.Muthusamy For respondents Mr.R.Prathap Kumar Additional Public Prosecutor

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

[Order of the Court was made by P.N.PRAKASH, J.]

¶12

It is the case of the petitioner that her husband Baskaran, aged 55 years, went missing on 30.12.2014 and his whereabouts are not known and the police have not taken effective steps to secure him.

¶13

On instructions, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that, the petitioner's husband Baskaran was working in a co-operative society and had defalcated certain amounts;

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

therefore, an enquiry was initiated against him; earlier, Baskaran left his house in March 2011, in connection with which, a case in Suramangalam P.S.Crime No.470 of 2011 was registered; during the pendency of the investigation, he returned home on 14.06.2013 and the said case was closed; thereafter, he was dismissed from service on 15.12.2014 on charges of misappropriation; again, he has left his house on 15.12.2014, for which, the petitioner has given a complaint only on 12.12.2020 and has filed the present petition in 2021.

¶16

However, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that, on a complaint given by the petitioner, a case in Suramangalam P.S.Crime No.251 of 2021 for “man missing” has been registered today (28.04.2021).

¶17

In view of the above, it cannot be stated that the petitioner's husband Baskaran is in the illegal custody of anyone, for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus. However, the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Salem West, is directed to monitor the investigation in Suramangalam P.S.Crime No.251 of 2021 and keep the petitioner informed of the developments, if any. As and when the said Baskaran is secured, he shall be produced before the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Salem, under intimation to the petitioner. On such production, the learned Magistrate shall pass appropriate orders with regard to his custody.

¶18

This Habeas Corpus Petition stands disposed of accordingly. Sd/-

¶19

Assistant Registrar(CO)

¶20

//True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar

¶21

gya To 1 The Judicial Magistrate No.II Salem

¶22

2 The Commissioner of Police Salem Corporation Salem Commissioner Office Salem

¶23

3 The Assistant Commissioner of Police Salem West

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶25

4 The Inspector of Police Suramangalam Police Station Salem 636 005

¶26

5 The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras

¶27

H.C.P. No.498 of 2021

¶28

VBM(CO) CB(15/06/2021)

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

B.Jayanthi v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

B.Jayanthi v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Jaya Vs District Collector and

Uma Vs State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by

Munusamy Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep.by

R.Amsaveni Vs the State Rep by

K.Jeeva Vs the Commissioner of Police

S.Arivazhagan Vs the Superintendent of Police