Dismissed

K.Rajamalli Kuppusamy v. State Rep by

Madras HC21 Jun 2021HCP/488/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed a habeas corpus petition seeking direction to produce her missing 22-year-old daughter. The Court noted a registered case and ongoing divorce proceedings. It closed the petition but directed the police to monitor the investigation and keep the petitioner informed. Upon production of the detenue, appropriate custody orders shall be passed by the Judicial Magistrate.

What did the court decide?

The petition was closed. The Deputy Superintendent of Police was directed to monitor the investigation and keep the petitioner informed. Upon production of the detenue, the Judicial Magistrate shall p

K.Rajamalli Kuppusamy Vs State Rep by — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 21.06.2021

¶3

Coram

¶4

The Honourable Mr. Justice P.N.PRAKASH and The Honourable Mr. Justice R.PONGIAPPAN

¶5

H.C.P.No.488 of 2021

¶6

K.Rajamalli Kuppusamy .. Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Superintendent of Police,
Kallakurichi District,
Kallakurichi.
2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
Ulundurpet Circle,
Kallakurichi District.
3. The Inspector of Police,
Edaikkal Police Station,
Kallakurichi District.
4.Karthikeyan .. Respondents
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus to direct the 3 rd
respondent to produce the petitioner's daughter Kasthuri
Kuppusamy, aged about 22 years, before this Court and set her at
liberty.

¶7

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Nizar Ahamad
For Respondents : Mr.R.Muniyapparaj
Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side)
ORDER
[Order of the Court was made by P.N.PRAKASH, J.]

¶8

This habeas corpus petition has been filed seeking to direct the 3^rd respondent to produce the petitioner's daughter Kasthuri Kuppusamy, aged about 22 years, before this Court and set her at liberty.

¶9

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶10

It is the case of the petitioner that her daughter Kasthuri Kuppusamy, aged about 22 years, who was married to one Karthikeyan, fourth respondent herein, went missing since 30.07.2020 and that the police are not taking effective steps to secure her.

¶11

On instructions, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that on a complaint given by the petitioner, a case in Edaikkal Police Station Crime No.103 of 2021 has been registered on 29.03.2021 for 'woman missing' and investigation is in progress. He also submitted that the fourth respondent has filed a divorce proceedings in H.M.O.P.No.3 of 21 before the Subordinate Court, Ulundurpet, against Kasturi Kuppusamy.

¶12

In view of the above, this habeas corpus petition is closed with a direction to the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kallakurichi, to monitor the investigation in Edaikkal Police Station Crime No.103 of 2021 and keep the petitioner informed of the developments, if any. As and when the detenue Kasturi Kuppusamy, aged about 22 years, is secured, she may be produced before the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Ulundurpet, under intimation to the petitioner. On such production, the learned Magistrate shall pass appropriate orders with regard to the custody in accordance with law.

¶13

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-V)

¶14

//True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar

¶15

nsd To 1. The Judicial Magistrate-I, Ulundurpet. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Kallakurichi District, Kallakurichi. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ulundurpet Circle, Kallakurichi District.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

The Inspector of Police, Edaikkal Police Station, Kallakurichi District.

¶18

The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai – 600 104.

¶19

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kallakuruchi.

¶20

H.C.P.No.488 of 2021

¶21

RLD(CO)
HS(14/07/2021)

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Rajamalli Kuppusamy v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Rajamalli Kuppusamy v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Barani Vs the Govt of Tamilnadu, Rep by Its

S.P.Lakshmi Vs the Commissioner of Police

B.Saraswathi Vs the Superintendent of Police

Shantha Vs the Secretary to Government

Johnpetti Vs the Secretary to Government

Manjula Vs The Home Secretary (Prison)