K.Murugan v. the State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by
Case brief
What is this about?
This order rejects a prayer by the Assistant Public Prosecutor for listing the habeas corpus petition for lunch motion. The detenu appeared in person, and the Court found no illegal detention, closing the petition.
What did the court decide?
None. The petition stands closed as the detenu appeared and was found not to be in illegal detention.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 21.10.2021
Coram
The Honourable Mr. Justice P.N.PRAKASH and The Honourable Mrs. Justice S.SRIMATHY
H.C.P.No.1690 of 2021
K.Murugan .. Petitioner
Vs.
- 1.State of Tamil Nadu represented by The Secretary, Home Department, Fort George, Chennai-09.
- 2.The Director General of Police, Mylapore, Chennai – 04.
- 3.The Superintendent of Police, Thiruvallur.
- 4.The Joint Director, Central Bureau of Investigation, Sastri Nagar, Chennai.
5.P.K.Sekar Babu, Honourable Minister of HR and CE, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort George, Chennai – 12.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.Murugan
- respondent
State of Tamil Nadu represented by The Secretary, Home Department, Fort George, Chennai-09
- respondent
The Director General of Police, Mylapore, Chennai – 04
- respondent
The Superintendent of Police, Thiruvallur
- respondent
The Joint Director, Central Bureau of Investigation, Sastri Nagar, Chennai
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court