Dismissed

P.Kannan v. the Superintendent of Police

Madras HC4 Feb 2021HCP/151/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a habeas corpus petition seeking the release of the petitioner's 19-year-old daughter, alleging missing status. Upon receipt of information that the girl had eloped with a man against whom IPC 366-A was registered, the Court closed the petition, directing the police to monitor the investigation and produce the girl to a Judicial Magistrate upon security.

What did the court decide?

Petition closed; direction to monitor investigation in Crime No.2724 of 2020; production of the girl to Judicial Magistrate upon securing.

P.Kannan Vs the Superintendent of Police — Child Custody and Guardianship | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 04.02.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM

¶5

H.C.P.No.151 of 2021

¶6

P.Kannan ... Petitioner Vs.

¶7

1.The Superintendent of Police, Tiruvarur District Police Office, Collector Office Master Plan Complex, Thiruvarur, Tamil Nadu – 610 004.

¶8

2.State represented by The Inspector of Police, Muthupettai Police Station, Tiruvarur District. ... Respondents

¶9

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus to direct the 2^nd respondent herein to produce the daughter of the petitioner viz., Sheha, 19 years, before this Court and set her at liberty.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Muthukumar For Respondents: Mr.R.Prathap Kumar, Addl. Public Prosecutor ORDER

¶11

[Order of the Court was made by P.N.PRAKASH, J.]

¶12

The habeas corpus petition has been filed seeking to direct the 2^nd respondent herein to produce the daughter of the petitioner viz., Sheha, 19 years, before this Court and set her at liberty.

¶13

It is the case of the petitioner that his daughter Sneha, aged about 19 years, went missing from 29.12.2020 and that the police are not taking effective steps to secure her.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

On instructions, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that on a complaint given by Rajeswari, sister of the petitioner herein, a case in Muthupettai Police Station Crime No.2724 of 2020 has been registered under Section 366-A IPC against Kamesh, with whom Sneha is said to have eloped as she was in love with him.

¶16

In view of the above, this habeas corpus petition is closed with a direction to the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Muthupettai Sub-Division, Tiruvarur District, to monitor the investigation in Muthupettai Police Station Crime No.2724 of 2020 and keep the petitioner informed of the developments, if any. As and when the detenue is secured, she may be produced before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruthuraipoondi, under intimation to the petitioner.

¶17

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS IV)

¶18

//True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar

¶19

nsd To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Thiruthuraipoondi. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Muthupettai Sub-Division, Tiruvarur. 3.The Superintendent of Police, Tiruvarur District Police Office, Collector Office Master Plan Complex, Thiruvarur, Tamil Nadu – 610 004. 4.The Inspector of Police, Muthupettai Police Station, Tiruvarur District. 5.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

¶20

+1cc to M/s.R.Muthukumar, Advocate Sr.6406

¶21

H.C.P. No.151 of 2021

¶22

sra[co] srg 05/03/2021

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

P.Kannan v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Kannan v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Rajamani Vs the State Rep.by Its

S.Asaithambi Vs State Rep by

A.Murugan Vs State by

Dhanalakshmi Sridhar Vs the Deputy Director Ch

Dhanraj Alias Dhanarajan Vs State Represented by

Kolavi Kannan @ Nagaraj Vs State Rep.by