Ramasamy v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
A habeas corpus petition filed by a father regarding his missing 21-year-old daughter was closed with a direction to the Deputy Superintendent of Police to monitor the ongoing investigation and keep the petitioner informed.
What did the court decide?
Petition closed; direction to Deputy Superintendent of Police to monitor investigation and inform petitioner of developments.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 26.08.2021
Coram
The Honourable Mr. Justice P.N.PRAKASH and The Honourable Ms. Justice R.N.MANJULA
H.C.P.No.1307 of 2021
Ramasamy
...Petitioner
Vs.
State represented by
- The Superintendent of Police, District Superintendent Office, Perambalur.
- The Inspector of Police, Kunnam Police Station, Perambalur District.
- Balaji ...Respondents
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondents herein to produce the body of the petitioner's daughter Kiruthika, D/o.Ramasamy, aged about 21 years, who is now illegally detained by the 3rd respondent before this Court and set her at liberty.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a writ of Habeas Corpus should be issued to direct production of a missing girl.
Whether the police investigation into her abduction should be monitored by this court.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ramasamy
- respondent
State represented by The Superintendent of Police
- respondent
Balaji
- other
Kiruthika
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court