Dismissed

Flinto Learning Solutions Private Limited v. Funfinity Learning Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Madras HC1 Jul 2021CS/734/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras dismissed a civil suit for trademark infringement and injunction as withdrawn by the plaintiff. Consequently, connected applications regarding injunctions and delay condonation were closed with no order as to costs.

What did the court decide?

The suit was dismissed as withdrawn. Connected applications were closed. No order as to costs.

Flinto Learning Solutions Private Limited Vs Funfinity… — Intellectual Property | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

(ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION)

¶4

THURSDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JULY 2021

¶5

THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN

¶6

C.S.(Com.Div) NO.734 OF 2018 AND

¶7

O.A.NO.979 OF 2018

¶8

AND A Nos.5841 & 6007 OF 2019 AND A.Sr.Nos.60844 & 60845 OF 2020

¶9

Flinto Learning Solutions Private Limited a company duly incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 Rep. by its Director Mr.D.Arunprasad And having its office at Bharani Flats, Flat-G1, Block-2, No.1, S.M.Narayan Nagar, Anna Nagar West Extension Chennai 600 101, Tamil Nadu Also at G2, No.36, Chandrasekaran Avenue 2nd Main Road, Thoraipakkam, Chennai 600 097, Tamil Nadu

¶10

...Plaintiff / Applicant in O.A.NO.979 OF 2018

¶11

Versus

¶12

1.Funfinity Learning Solutions Private Limited a company existing and incorporated Under the Companies Act 2013 of the address 7 & 18 Jalaram Industrial Estate, Bannerghatta Road, Near Arekere Gate, Bangalore- 560 076, Karnataka, India.

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

...Respondent No.1/Defendant No.1 in O.A.NO.979 OF 2018

¶15

¶16

Google India Private Limited a company incorporated under the Companies Act 1956 of the address No.3, RMZ Infinity-Tower E, Old Madras Road, 4th and 5th Floors, Bangalore, 560 016, Karnataka, India.

¶17

...Respondent No.2/Defendant No.2 in O.A.NO.979 OF 2018

¶18

3.Google LLC a company existing under the laws of the United States of America of the address 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, California 94043, United States of America.

¶19

...Respondent No.3/Defendant No.3 in O.A.NO.979 OF 2018

¶20

C.S.(Com.Div) NO.734 OF 2018:-

¶21

Civil suit praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to pass a judgment and decree for:-

¶22

(a) A permanent injunction restraining Defendant No.1, its men, agents, servants,licensees, franchisees, distributors, assigns and representatives or anyone claiming through or under them from infringing the Plaintiff's registered trademark "FLINTOBOX" by using it as Google Advertisement keyword or any other mark which is/are identical with and/or deceptively similar to the Plaintiff's trademarks either per-se or in combination with any other work/mark, and English or Tamil or any other language,, which is identical with and/or deceptively similar to Plaintiff's https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ registered trademark “FLINTOBOX” or in any other manner whatsoever;

¶23

¶24

(b) A Mandatory injunction directing Defendant No.1 to disclose the

¶25

details of the website traffic received by their use of “FLINTOBOX” as

¶26

Google Advertisement keyword infringing the Plaintiff's registered trademark;

¶27

(c) The Defendant No.1 be ordered to pay to the Plaintiff a sum of Rs.25,01,000/- as damages for the act of infringement of Trade Mark committed by Defendant No.1.

¶28

(d) directing the Defendant No.1 to render a true and faithful account of sales made by sale of products to the users visiting the website of the Defendant No.1 after search for the registered trademark “FLINTOBOX” of the Plaintiff and the Defendant No.1 be further ordered and directed to pay to the Plaintiff such amount as may be found due on such account being taken.

¶29

(e) For costs of the suit;

¶30

O.A.NO.979 OF 2018:-

¶31

Original Application praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to

¶32

grant an ad-interim injunction restraining Respondent No.1, its, men, agents, servants, licensees, franchisees, distributors, assigns and representatives or anyone claiming through or under them from infringing

¶33

the Applicant/Plaintiff's Registered Trademark “FLINTOBOX” by using it

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ as Keyword for Google Advertisements or any other mark which is/are

¶35

¶36

identical with and/or deceptively similar to the Applicant/Plaintiff's trademarks either per-se or in combination with any other work/mark, and English or Tamil or any other language, which is identical with and/or deceptively similar to Applicant/Plaintiff's registered trademark “FLINTOBOX” or in any other manner whatsoever; Pending disposal of the suit.

¶37

A No.5841 OF 2019:-

¶38

Google LLC a company existing under the laws of the United States of America of the address 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, California 94043, United States of America.

¶39

...Applicant/Respondent No.3/Defendant No.3

¶40

Versus

¶41

1.M/s.Flinto Learning Solutions Private Limited a company duly incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 Rep. by its Director Mr.D.Arunprasad And having its office at Bharani Flats, Flat-G1, Block-2, No.1, S.M.Narayan Nagar, Anna Nagar West Extension Chennai 600 101, Tamil Nadu Also at G2, No.36, Chandrasekaran Avenue 2nd Main Road, Thoraipakkam, Chennai 600 097, Tamil Nadu.

¶42

...Respondent No.1/ Applicant/Plaintiff

¶43

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2. Funfinity Learning Solutions Private Limited a company existing and incorporated Under the Companies Act 2013

¶44

¶45

of the address 7 & 18 Jalaram Industrial Estate, Bannerghatta Road, Near Arekere Gate, Bangalore- 560 076, Karnataka, India.

¶46

...Respondent No.2/

¶47

Respondent No.1/ Defendant No.1

¶48

3.Google India Private Limited a company incorporated under the Companie Act 1956 of the address No.3, RMZ Infinity-Tower E, Old Madras Road, 4th and 5th Floors, Bangalore, 560 016, Karnataka, India.

¶49

...Respondent No.3/ Respondent No.2/Defendant No.2

¶50

Application praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to vacate the

¶51

Injunction Order dated 12.11.2018 passed in O.A.No.979 of 2018 in

¶52

C.S.No.734 of 2018.

¶53

A No.6007 OF 2019:-

¶54

Google India Private Limited a company incorporated under the Companies Act 1956 of the address No.3, RMZ Infinity-Tower E, Old Madras Road, 4th and 5th Floors, Bangalore, 560 016, Karnataka, India.

¶55

...Applicant/ Respondent No.2/

Defendant No.2

Versus

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶60

No.1, S.M.Narayan Nagar,

¶61

Anna Nagar West Extension

¶62

¶63

Chennai 600 101, Tamil Nadu. Also at

¶64

G2, No.36, Chandrasekaran Avenue 2nd Main Road, Thoraipakkam, Chennai 600 097, Tamil Nadu

¶65

...Respondent No.1/ Applicant/ Plaintiff

¶66

Funfinity Learning Solutions Private Limited a company existing and incorporated Under the Companies Act 2013 of the address 7 & 18 Jalaram Industrial Estate, Bannerghatta Road, Near Arekere Gate, Bangalore- 560 076, Karnataka, India.

¶67

...Respondent No.2/ Respondent No.1/ Defendant No.1

¶68

3.Google LLC a company existing under the laws of the United States of America of the address 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, California 94043, United States of America.

¶69

...Respondent No.3/ Respondent No.3/ Defendant No.3

¶70

Application praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to vacate the

¶71

Injunction Order dated 12.11.2018 passes in O.A.No.979 of 2018 in

¶72

C.S.No.734 of 2018.

¶73

A.Sr.Nos.60844 & 60845 of 2020:-

¶74

Funfinity Learning Solutions Private Limited a company existing and incorporated Under the Companies Act 2013 of the address 7 & 18 Jalaram Industrial Estate, Bannerghatta Road, Near Arekere Gate,

¶75

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Bangalore- 560 076, Karnataka, India.

...Applicant

Versus

1.Flinto Learning Solutions Private Limited a company duly incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 Rep. by its Director Mr.D.Arunprasad And having its office at Bharani Fats, Flat-G1, Block-2, No.1, S.M.Narayan Nagar, Anna Nagar West Extension Chennai 600 101, Tamil Nadu Also at G2, No.36, Chandrasekaran Avenue 2nd Main Road, Thoraipakkam, Chennai 600 097, Tamil Nadu.

¶80

...1^st Respondent/Plaintiff

¶81

2.Google India Private Limited a company incorporated under the Companies Act 1956 of the address No.3, RMZ Infinity-Tower E, Old Madras Road, 4th and 5th Floors, Bangalore, 560 016, Karnataka, India. ...2^nd Respondent/2^nd Defendant

¶82

3.Google LLC a company existing under the laws of the United States of America

¶83

of the address 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, California 94043. ...3^rd Respondent/3^rd Defendant

¶84

A.Sr.No.60844 of 2020:-

¶85

Application praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to Condone

¶86

the delay of 45 days in filling the Written Statement in the above suit;

¶87

A.Sr.No.60845 of 2020:-

¶88

Application praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to grant leave

¶89

to adopt the Counter Affidavit filed by the 1^st Defendant on 12.02.2019 in

¶90

O.A.No.979/2018 as its written statement to the plaint filed in the above

¶91

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶92

suit;

¶93

¶94

This suit along with these applications coming on this day before this

¶95

court for hearing in the presence of Mr.R.Sathish kumar, Advocate for the plaintiff in C.S.No.734 of 2018 and for the applicant in O.A.No.979 of 2018 and for the 1st respondent in A.Nos.5841 & 6007 of 2019 A.Nos.60844 & 60845 of 2020 and Mr.R.S.Diwaagar, Advocate for the 1^st and 2^nd defendants in C.S.No.734 of 2018 and for the 1^st and 2^nd respondents in O.A.No.979 of 2018 and A.SR.Nos.60844 & 60845 of 2020and for the 2^nd and 3^rd respondents in A.No.5841 of 2019 and for the applicant and 2^nd respondent in A.No.6007 of 2019 and Mr.G.Balasubramanian, Advocate for the 3rd defendant in C.S.No.734 of 2018 and for the 3rd respondent in O.A.No.979 of 2019 and A.SR.Nos.60844 & 60845 of 2020 A.No.6007 of 2019 and for the applicant in A.No.5841 of 2019 and upon reading the plaint filed in C.S.No.734 of 2018 and the judges summon and the affidavit of R.Suresh Babu filed in A.No.5841 of 2019 and the judges summon and the affidavit Y.Gitanjli Duggal filed in A.No.6007 of 2019 and the order dated 26.11.2018 made in O.A.No.979 of 2018 and the learned counsel for the plaintiff has filed a memo dated 29.06.2021 to withdraws the suit, and

¶96

this court doth recording the same. it is ordered as follows:

¶97

That the suit in C.S.No.734 of 2018, be and is hereby dismissed as

¶98

withdrawn.

¶99

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶100

¶101

1. That the O.A.No.979 of 2018 and A.Nos.5841 and 6007 of 2019

¶102

and A.Sr.Nos.60844 & 60845 of 2020 do stand closed.

¶103

1. That there shall be no order as to costs of this suit.

¶104

WITNESS THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE, HIGH COURT AT MADRAS AFORESAID, THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JULY 2021.

¶105

Sd./-

¶106

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (Comm.Cases) //Certified to be true copy//

¶107

Dated at Madras this the day of 2021.

¶108

COURT OFFICER(O.S.)

¶109

From 25th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Orders/Judgments.

¶110

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶111

¶112

VSP 04/08/2021

¶113

C.S.No.734 of 2018(Com.Div) And O.A.No.979 of 2018 And A.Nos.5841 & 6007 of 2019 And A.Sr.No.60844 & 60845 of 2020

¶114

ORDER

¶115

DATED : 01.07.2021

¶116

THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN

¶117

FOR APPROVAL: 08/10/2021

¶118

APPROVED ON:20/10/2021

¶119

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶120

¶121

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶122

Dated : 01.07.2021

¶123

CORAM:

¶124

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN

¶125

C.S.(Com.Div.) No.734 of 2018

¶126

and

¶127

A.Nos.5841, 6007/2019 & A.Sr.No.60844 & 60845/2020 and

¶128

O.A.No.979/2018

¶129

Flinto Learning Solutions Private Limited, a Company duly incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 Rep.by its Director Mr.D.Arunprasad And having its office at Bharani Flats, Flat-G1, Block-2, No.1, S.M.Narayan Nagar, Anna Nagar West Extension, Chennai 600101, Tamilnadu. .. Plaintiff

¶130

/versus/

¶131

1.Funfinity Learning Solutions Private Limited

¶132

a company existing and incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013 of the address 7 & 18 Jalaram Industrial Estate, Bannerghatta Road, Near Arekere Gate, Bangalore-560076, Karnataka, India.

¶133

2.Google India Private Limited a company incorporated under Companies Act, 1956 of the address No.3, RMZ Infinity-Tower E,

¶134

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Old Madras Road, 4^th and 5^th Floors, Bangalore-560016, Karnataka, India.

¶135

¶136

3. Google LLC,

¶137

a company existing under the laws of the United States of America, of the address 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, California 94043, United States of America. .. Defendants

¶138

This Civil Suit is filed under Order IV Rule 1 Original Side Rules read with Order VII Rule 1 of CPC Read With Sections28, 29, 134 and Sections 135 of the Trademarks Act 1999 & Proviso 1 to Section 7 of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, No.4 of 2016, prayed for (a) A permanent injunction restraining defendant No.1, its men, agents, servants, licensees, franchisees, distributors, assigns and representatives or anyone claiming through or under them from infringing the plaintiff's registered trademark “FLINTOBOX” by using it as Google Advertisement keyword or any other mark which is/are identical with and/or deceptively similar to the plaintiff's trademarks either per-se or in combination with any other work/mark, and English or Tamil or any other language, which is identical with and/or deceptively similar to plaintiff's registered trademark “FLINTOBOX”or any other manner whatsoever;

¶139

(b) A Mandatory injunction directing defendant No.1 to disclose the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ details of the website traffic received by their use of “FLINTOBOX” as

¶140

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶141

¶142

Google Advertisement keyword infringing the plaintiff's registered trademark;

¶143

(c) The defendant No.1 be ordered to pay to the plaintiff a sum of Rs.25,01,000/- as damages for the act of infringement of trademark committed by defendant No.1;

¶144

(d) Directing the defendant No.1 to render a true and faithful account of sales made by sale of products to the users visiting the website of the defendant No.1 after search for the registered trademark “FLINTOBOX” of the plaintiff and the defendant No.1 be further ordered and directed to pay to the plaintiff such amount as may be found due on such account being taken;

¶145

(e) For costs of the suit.

¶146

For plaintiff : Mr.R.Sathish Kumar For Defendants : Mr.R.S.Diwaagar for D1& D2 : Mr.G.Balasubramanian for D3

¶147

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶148

¶149

JUDGMENT

¶150

The learned counsel for the plaintiff has filed a memo to withdraw the

¶151

suit.

¶152

Recording the same, the civil suit is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶153

Consequently, connected applications are also closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶154

Sd./-G.J.J 01.07.2021

¶155

//Certified to be true copy//

¶156

Dated at Madras this the day of 2021.

¶157

COURT OFFICER(O.S.)

¶158

From 25th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.

¶159

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Flinto Learning Solutions Private Limited v. Funfinity Learning Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Flinto Learning Solutions Private Limited v. Funfinity Learning Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Shanthananda Steels Private Limited, Rep.by its Director, Mr.Ritesh Rai, Vs M/s.Radha Vyapar(India) Private Limited, Rep.by its authorised signatory,Mr.Yashpal Sharma.

M/s Rkkr Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/s Radha Industries Pvt. Ltd.

Mr.B.Pradeep Vs Mr.K.Thirugnanam and another

Flinto Learining Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Vs Brainbees Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Flinto Learning Solutions Private Limited Vs Imagismart Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Flinto Learning Solution Private Limited Vs Metis Learning Solutions Pvt. Ltd.