Allowed

Rijo Stiby v. M/s Saregama India Ltd.

Madras HC30 Mar 2021CS/65/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This case involves a suit filed under the Trade Marks Act regarding alleged trademark infringement. During the suit's pendency, the parties amicably settled the dispute via a memo of compromise, wherein the defendant acknowledged the plaintiff's trademarks and agreed to cease specific publications and activities. The court decreed the suit in terms of this compromise.

What did the court decide?

The suit was decreed in terms of the Joint Memo of Compromise, which ceased publication under the infringing title and required destruction of materials.

Rijo Stiby Vs M/s Saregama India Ltd. — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

C.S.No.65 of 2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 17.11.2021

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH

¶6

C.S.No.65 of 2021 and O.A.Nos.603, 604 & 605 of 2021 and Application Nos.3519 and 3522 of 2021

¶7

Talk Media (P) Ltd., 85, Mount Roadm Guindy, Chennai – 600 032. rep. by its Authorized Signatory, T.R.Jawahar, Director.

¶8

...Plaintiff

¶9

.Vs.

¶10

1.Talk Media Express times, No.115/49, Purasawalkam, Chennai – 600 007.

¶11

2.Bharani Press,

¶12

77/86, Venkatathiri Street, Kosapet, Chennai – 600 012.

¶13

... Defendants

¶14

Plaint filed under Order IV Rule 1 of O.S. Rules read with Sections 27, 29, 134 & 135 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 praying for:

¶15

a)A perpetual injunction restraining the defendants, its distributors, printer, stockists, servants, agents, retailers, representatives, franchisees or any other person claiming through

¶16

Page No.1/8

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

C.S.No.65 of 2021

¶19

or under them from in any manner whatsoever infringing the plaintiff's registered trademark 'Talk' by manufacturing, selling, offering for sale, stocking, advertising, exporting, importing either directly and/or indirectly any goods and in particular newspapers under the trademark 'Talk Media Express Times' either per-se or in combination and/or any other mark either in English or Tamil or any other language, which is identical with and/or deceptively similar to plaintiff's registered trademark “Talk” or in any other manner whatsoever;

¶20

b)A perpetual injunction restraining the defendants, its distributors, printer, stockists, servants, agents, retailers, representatives, franchisees or any other person claiming through or under them from in any manner whatsoever passing off the plaintiff's mark 'Talk Media' by manufacturing, selling, offering for sale, stocking, advertising, exporting, importing either directly and/or indirectly any goods and in particular newspapers under the trademark 'Talk Media Express Times' either per-se or in combination and/or any other mark either in English or Tamil or any other language, which is identical with and/or deceptively similar to plaintiff's mark “Talk Media” or in any other manner whatsoever;

¶21

Page No.2/8

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

C.S.No.65 of 2021

¶24

c)A perpetual injunction restraining the defendants, its distributors, printer, stockists, servants, agents, retailers, representatives, franchisees or any other person claiming through or under them from in any manner whatsoever infringing the plaintiff's tradename 'Talk Media' by manufacturing, selling, offering for sale, stocking, advertising, exporting, importing either directly and/or indirectly any goods and in particular newspapers under the trademark 'Talk Media Express Times' either per-se or in combination and/or any other mark either in English or Tamil or any other language, which is identical with and/or deceptively similar to plaintiff's tradename “Talk Media” or in any other manner whatsoever;

¶25

d)The defendants be ordered to surrender to plaintiffs for destruction newspapers, labels, dues, printing machines, blocks, plates, moulds, screen prints, packing materials, and other materials bearing the trademark 'Talk Media Express Times' either per se or in combination in English or Tamil or any other language;

¶26

e)A preliminary decree be passed in favour of the plaintiffs directing the defendants to render account of profits made by use of

¶27

Page No.3/8

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

C.S.No.65 of 2021

¶30

trademark 'Talk Media Express Times' either per-se or in combination and/or any othe rmark either in Englinsh or Tamil or any other language and a final decree be passed in favour of the plaintiffs for the amount of profits thus found to have been made by the defendants after the latter have rendered account;

¶31

f)The defendants be ordered and decreed to pay to the plaintiffs a sum of Rs.25,01,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Lakh and one Thousand only) as special damages for acts of passing off and infringement of trademark and tradename committed by them;

¶32

g)for costs of the suit; and

¶33

For Plaintiff : Mr.Rahul Balaji For Defendants : Mr.K.S.Ganesh Babu for D1

¶34

J U D G M E N T

¶35

The present suit was filed with the grievance that there is an infringement of the plaintiff's registered trademark and consequently, various reliefs were sought for against the defendants.

¶36

Page No.4/8

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

C.S.No.65 of 2021

¶39

2.During the pendency of the suit, the parties have amicably

¶40

settled the dispute among themselves and have entered into a memo of compromise. The memo of compromise filed before this Court has been signed by both the parties as well as their respective counsel.

¶41

3.The relevant Clauses in the Memo of Compromise are

¶42

extracted hereunder:

¶43

2.The 1^st defendant acknowledges that the mark 'TALK' prefixed with locality name and tradename 'TALK MEDIA' used in publication of newspaper weekly are well known trademarks of the plaintiff as defined under Sec.2(zg) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

¶44

3.The 1^st Defendant, in publishing and marketing newspaper weekly under the Title of 'TALK MEDIA EXPRESS TIMES' (filed as Annexure 'B'), acknowledges that trademark 'TALK' and trademark “TALK MEDIA' (filed as Annexure 'A') are mark of the plaintiff.

¶45

4.Therefore, the defendants agree to stop the publish, manufacture, sale, offer for sale, stocking, advertising, exporting, importing either directly or indirectly any goods, and in particular newspaper under

¶46

Page No.5/8

¶47

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶48

C.S.No.65 of 2021

¶49

the Title 'Talk Media Express Times' either per-se or in combination and/or any other mark either in English or Tamil or any other language, which is identical with and/or deceptively similar to plaintiff's registered trademark 'TALK' (as shown in Annexure 'A') or in any other manner whatsoever including use of the works “TALK” and “MEDIA” as part of the newspaper name or corporate identity in any combination and thereby avoid litigation/

¶50

5.The 1^st Defendant shall withdraw the application/registration of Title of 'TALK MEDIA EXPRESS TIMES' before the Registrar of Newspapers and undertake to furnish proof thereof to the Plaintiff that such application/registration will stand withdrawn.

¶51

6.The 1^st Defendant has destroyed all newspapers, labels, dyes, plates, packing, materials, and other materials bearing the Defendant's trademark 'TALK MEDIA EXPRESS TIMES' which is identical/deceptively similar to the plaintiff's trademark 'TALK' and the tradename 'TALK MEDIA' as shown in Annexure 'A'.

¶52

7.The parties shall bear their respective costs in respect of the suit and they shall have no further claims whatsoever against each other and the present compromise fully and finally settles all the disputes forming subject matter of the present suit.

¶53

Page No.6/8

¶54

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶55

C.S.No.65 of 2021

¶56

8.the suit shall be decreed on the terms of the present joint memorandum of compromise and the joint memorandum of compromise shall form part of the decree.

¶57

4.In view of the above, this suit is decreed in terms of the Joint Memo of Compromise and the Joint Memo of Compromise shall form part of the decree. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, there will be no orders as to costs. Consequently, connected applications are closed.

¶58

17.11.2021

¶59

ssr Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No speaking order/Non-speaking order

¶60

Page No.7/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶61

C.S.No.65 of 2021

¶62

N. ANAND VENKATESH, J. ssr

¶63

C.S.No.65 of 2021 and O.A.Nos.603, 604 & 605 of 2021 and Application Nos.3519 and 3522 of 2021

¶64

17.11.2021

¶65

Page No.8/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Rijo Stiby v. M/s Saregama India Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rijo Stiby v. M/s Saregama India Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

1.CASTROL Ltd., Vs 1.MARVEL Petroleum

Mr.R.Ayubkhan Vs M/s.Kalaignar Tv Pvt.Ltd. and another

V.Sundaresan and 4 others Vs Varalakshmi Starch Industries Pvt. Ltd. and another

Durai Industrial Works Vs Durai Engineering Products

Dr.S.Vijaya Bharati (Decd.) Vs Mr.T.S.Ramalingam

Bahwan Cyber Tek Pvt. Ltd. Vs Aptivaa Consulting Solutions Pvt. Ltd.