Dismissed

Agrocrops India Ltd. v. Icic Bank Ltd.

Madras HC1 Sept 2021CS/521/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Civil suit filed for recovery of money against a bank. The dispute was settled via a joint compromise during mediation. The court approved the settlement, decreed the refund amount to the plaintiff, and ordered the withdrawal of the suit with refund of court fees.

What did the court decide?

Defendant to refund Rs.11,91,246.06; Plaintiff to withdraw suit; Refund of court fees to Plaintiff; No order as to costs.

Agrocrops India Ltd. Vs Icic Bank Ltd. — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

(ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION)

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021

¶5

THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN

¶6

C.S.(Comm.Div) No.521 of 2019

¶7

Agrocrops India Limited, (Formerly known as Agrocrops Exim Limited) Represented by its Authorized Signatory Mr.Nizamudeen, No.45, Room No.1, SM Plaza, 2^nd Floor, Armenian Street, Chennai – 600 002. ... Plaintiff

¶8

Versus

¶9

ICICI Bank Limited, Represented by its Branch Manager, 1^st Floor, Catholic Centre, 64, Armenian Street, Chennai – 600 001. ... Defendant

¶10

Civil suit praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to pass a judgment and decree in favour of the Plaintiff and against the Defendant as follows:-

¶11

(a) Directing the Defendant to pay the Plaintiff a sum of

¶12

Rs.1,03,19,606.42 along with further interest at the rate of 18% per annum

¶13

on Rs.85,28,021.06, from the date of filing the plaint till the date of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

recovery;

¶15

¶16

(b) Directing the Defendant to pay the costs of the suit;

¶17

This Civil Suit coming on this day before this court for hearing in the presence of Ms.Deepika murali, Advocate for the plaintiff herein and Mr.Damodaran for Mr.K.Moorthy, Advocates for the defendant herein and upon reading the plaint along with mediation report and Joint Compromise dated 23.07.2021 and the said Joint Compromise memo signed by the plaintiff and the defendant and their respective Advocates and the said Advocates for the parties hereto praying this court to pass decree in terms of the schedule morefully set out in the Joint Compromise hereunder and it is

¶18

in terms thereof ordered and decreed as follows:-

¶19

That the Plaintiff herein, shall provide the following documents to the Defendant herein on or before 23.07.2021 to enable the Defendant to make the payment as specified in Clause (b):

¶20

(i) The Certificate of Incorporation issued by the Registrar of companies evidencing change of Plaintiff's name from “Agrocrops Exim Ltd.,” To “Agrocrops India Ltd.,”

¶21

(ii) The Certificate of Incorporation issued by the Registrar of

¶22

Companies evidencing change of Plaintiff's name from “Agrocrops India https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Ltd.,” To “Agrocrops India Private Ltd.,”

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶24

¶25

(iii) Amended copies of the Memorandum of Association and Articles

¶26

of Association reflecting the current name of the Plaintiff.

¶27

(iv) Board Resolution of the Plaintiff authorizing Mr.Nizamudeen to enter into this compromise with the Defendant concerning the above suit.

¶28

That upon the Plaintiff herein providing the above documents to the satisfaction of the Defendant, the Defendant shall refund to the Plaintiff a sum of Rs.11,91,246.06/- (Eleven Lakhs Ninety-One Thousand Two Hundred and Forty Six Rupees and Six paise Only) towards full and final settlement on or before 26.07.2021 by way of a Demand Draft issued in favour of “Agrocrops India Private Limited”.

¶29

That the Plaintiff herein, shall withdraw the suit against the Defendant in C.S.No.521 of 2019 as settled fully and shall not initiate any other proceedings against the Defendant with respect to the subject matter of the suit.

¶30

That the Parties hereto, affirm and declare that the respective Authorized Signatories of the Parties have the authority to enter into this compromise in order to give quietus to the dispute that has arisen between them.

¶31

That the Parties hereto, affirm and declare that they have no claims against each other and all their issues have been resolved amicably in all https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ respects upon signing this Joint Memo of Compromise.

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶33

¶34

That a certificate under section 69 of the TamilNadu Court fees and

¶35

suits valuations Act XIV of 1955 (Amended Act) do issue herein out of and under the seal of this court in favour of Agrocrops India Ltd rep by its authorized signatory Nizamudeen the plaintiff herein, authorising him to receive from the pay and Account Office High Court, Chennai a sum of Rs.1,07,500/- (Rupees One Lakh Seven Thousand Five Hundred Only) being the entire court fee paid on the plaint by the plaintiff herein.

¶36

That there shall be no order as to costs of this suit.

¶37

SCHEDULE – JOINT MEMO OF COMPROMISE

¶38

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶39

¶40

VSP 01/12/2021

¶41

C.S.(Comm.Div)No.521 of 2019

¶42

ORDER

¶43

DATED : 01.09.2021

¶44

THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN

¶45

FOR APPROVAL:03/12/2021

¶46

APPROVED ON:03/12/2021

¶47

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶48

¶49

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶50

DATED : 01.09.2021

¶51

CORAM

¶52

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN

¶53

C.S (Comm.Div.).No.521 of 2019

¶54

Agrocrops India Limited (Formerly Known as Agrocrops Exim Limited) Represented by its Authorised Signatory Mr.Nizamudeen, No.45, Room No.1, SM Plaza 2^nd Floor, Armenian Street, Chennai-600 002. ... Plaintiff

¶55

Vs. ICICI Bank Limited Represented by its Branch Manager 1^st Floor, Catholic Centre, 64, Armenian Street, Chennai-600 001. ... Defendant

¶56

Prayer: This Civil Suit is filed under Order VII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Read with Order IV Rule 1 of The Madras High Court Original Side Rules read with Section 7 of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Court Act 4 of 2016 prayed for.

¶57

(A) Directing the Defendant to pay the Plaintiff a sum of Rs.1,03,19,606.42 along with further interest at the rate of 18% per annum

¶58

on Rs.85,28,021,06 from the date of filing the plaint till the date of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ recovery;

¶59

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶60

¶61

(B) Directing the Defendant to pay the costs of the suit;

¶62

For Plaintiff : Ms.Deepika Murali. For Defendant : Mr.Damodaran for Mr.K.Moorthy.

¶63

JUDGMENT

¶64

(This case has been heard through video conference)

¶65

The parties have settled their dispute through Mediation and a Joint Memorandum of Compromise is filed.

¶66

Recording the same, the suit is disposed of in terms of the Joint Memo of compromise. The terms of memo of compromise shall form part

¶67

of the decree. No order as to costs. Since the matter is settled through ADR,

¶68

the Plaintiff shall be refunded the Court fee paid as per the law.

¶69

Sd./-G.J.J 01.09.2021

¶70

//Certified to be true copy// Dated at Madras this the day of 2021.

¶71

COURT OFFICER(O.S.)

¶72

From 25th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.

¶73

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Agrocrops India Ltd. v. Icic Bank Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Agrocrops India Ltd. v. Icic Bank Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.Kaleesuwari Refinery Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/s.Shakthi Amma and Co.

Aqua Pump Industries Vs Tapesh Kumar

Global Conusmer Products Private Limited Vs Golden Chocolates Private Limited

M/s.Radiance Media P.Ltd. Vs M/s.Magic Frames and 3 others

Mr.Arumugam Rajedra Babu Vs Ashok Leyland Limited and 5 Others

Cavinkare Pvt. Limited - Trends Division Vs P and P Associates and 2 others