The court, at the instance of the defendant, directed the incorporation of specific typographical corrections in a prior judgment dated 07.09.2021 to address inadvertent errors in the order. The registry is directed to upload the corrected copy.
Directing that specific statements in the judgment of 07.09.2021 be corrected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.S(Comm.Div.).No.412 of 2020 and O.A.No.770 of 2020
C.S(Comm.Div.).No.412 of 2020 and
O.A.No.770 of 2020
DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J.
Today, the matter is listed under the caption “for being mentioned” at the instance of the learned counsel for the defendant in C.S.No.412 of 2020.
corrections are to be incorporated in the judgment passed by this Court in C.S.No.412 of 2020 dated 07.09.2021:
(ii) In paragraph No.12, the 9th line, the word “plaintiff” should be replaced as “defendant” .
(iii) In paragraph No.13, in the last line, the year “1994” should be corrected as “2012” .
(iv) In paragraph No.15, the 1st and 5th line, the word “plaintiff” should be replaced as “defendant” .
DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J.
C.S(Comm.Div.).No.412 of 2020 and O.A.No.770 of 2020
rpl
24.09.2021
rpl
C.S(Comm.Div.).No.412 of 2020 and O.A.No.770 of 2020
DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
