the parties the controversy is limited to the transactions in the rights over the some of the movies. The parties are not at variance on the fact that there may not be much left in the business today. Admittedly, Sri Sai Production has stopped activities even in the year 1994, therefore, whatever copy rights that remain with the firm may not be of a significant value. It is seen from Ex.D1, the partnership deed dated 01.04.1995 relating to the M/s.Sri Sai Productions, which is shown item I in Schedule B of the plaint, that the second plaintiff, the first defendant and the fourth defendant are the partners of the said business. In the partition deed dated 06.10.1983 entered into between the heirs of late R.S.Srinivasan, it is stated that the said business shown as item 5 in Schedule A to the said partition deed is allotted to the parties of the first part to the third part, viz. the plaintiffs and the first defendant. However, the subsequent partnership deed dated 01.04.1995 shows that the second plaintiff, the first defendant and the fourth defendant are the partners of the said Firm. The partnership deed dated 01.04.1995 marked as Ex.D1 would also recite that it is a reconstitution of the partnership entered into on 01.04.1990 between the parties. It is conceded by the counsel for the plaintiffs as well as the first defendant that the partnership business as well as the other businesses shown in the B Schedule are not worth anything substantial as on today. There are Negative Rights in certain movies which had also according to
