Civil Revision Petition dismissed for default as the appellant failed to be present for arguments despite multiple postings over several years.
Petition dismissed for default; connected Miscellaneous Petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(MD)No.997 of 2017
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.07.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.THARANI C.R.P.(MD)No.997 of 2017 and C.M.P.(MD)No.4480 of 2017
M/s.I.K.Construction,
Represented by its Proprietor I.Kezhson, ... Petitioner/ Appellant/ Decree holder / Plaintiff
Vs.
1.M/s.Satyam Educational Trust,
Rep. by its Chairman A.Thinagar ... 1st Respondent/Respondent/ Judgment Debtor / Defendant
2.The Director of Technical Education, Directorate of Technical Education, Chennai – 600 025.
3.The Adi-Dravidar Welfare Department, Rep. by its Secretary,
Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005. ... Respondent 2 and 3 / Garnishees
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, against the order dated 18.04.2017 passed in Unnumbered E.A.(SR)No.1860 of 2017 in E.P.No.1 of 2017 in O.S.No.124 of 2012 on the file of the District Judge, Kanyakumari District.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Puhazh Gandhi For R1 : Mr.C.Jeganathan for M/s.Veera Associates For R2 and R3 : Mr.S.Saravanan Government Advocate
ORDER
The learned counsel for the respondents ready for arguments and the learned counsel for the revision petitioners not ready for arguments.
2.This petition is pending from the year 2017, ie., for the past five years. This matter is placed before me on 19.04.2021, 29.04.2021, 14.06.2021, 21.06.2021, 28.06.2021, but, the learned revision petitioner not ready for arguments. Hence, the matter is posted today (22.07.2021) “for arguments” “finally”. Even today, the learned counsel for the revision petitioner not ready for arguments. There is no use in keeping the revision pending any further.
1/2
C.R.P.(MD)No.997 of 2017
3.Hence, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CO)
// True Copy //
/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
Ls
To
1.The District Judge, Kanyakumari District.
2.The Director of Technical Education, Directorate of Technical Education, Chennai – 600 025.
3.The Secretary, Adi-Dravidar Welfare Department, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.
+1 CC to M/s.VEERA ASOCIATES, Advocate ( SR-23402[F] dated 22/07/2021 )
+1 CC to M/s.GP ( SR-23733[F] dated 23/07/2021 )
C.R.P(MD)No.997 of 2017 22.07.2021
ls(CO) TR(02.08.2021) 2P 6C
2/2
M/s.I.K.Construction
M/s.Satyam Educational Trust
The Director of Technical Education
The Adi-Dravidar Welfare Department
R.Tharani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
