R.Sivarasu v. Senthilkumar
Case brief
What is this about?
Revised the order appointing an Advocate Commissioner in a suit regarding property boundary dispute to expand the Commissioner's scope to include two specific survey numbers.
What did the court decide?
Modified the scope of the warrant issued to the Advocate Commissioner to include S.No.436/2 and S.No.448.
What the court decided
C.R.P.(PD) (MD) No.822 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.12.2021 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA C.R.P.(PD) (MD) No.822 of 2020 and C.M.P.(MD) No.5581 of 2020
R.Sivarasu
.. Petitioner/Respondent/ Plaintiff
-vs-
1.Senthilkumar
2.Jothikannan
3.Ganeshkumar
4.Mahalakshmi .. Respondents/Respondents/ Defendants 1 to 4
Prayer :- Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the fair and decreetal order made in I.A.No.7 of 2019 in O.S.No.63 of 2019 by the District Munsif Court, Palani dated 30.09.2020.
For Petitioner : Mr.D.Venkatesh
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R.Sivarasu
- respondent
1.Senthilkumar
- respondent
2.Jothikannan
- respondent
3.Ganeshkumar
- respondent
4.Mahalakshmi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court