Dismissed

Y.Linga Durai v. Muthupradeepa

Madras HC1 Jun 2021CRP(MD)/801/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a civil revision petition under Article 227 to ensure disposal of a pending divorce petition at Nagercoil Family Court. The court found no Judicial Officer posted at the court and could not issue directs to expedite hearing, granting liberty to approach the court when an officer is posted. The petition was disposed of.

What did the court decide?

No direction was issued; petitioner granted liberty to mention the matter when the Judicial Officer is posted, as no officer was manning the Court.

Y.Linga Durai Vs Muthupradeepa — Matrimonial and Divorce | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

C.R.P(MD)No.801 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 01.06.2021

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM and

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.ANANTHI

¶7

C.R.P(PD)(MD)No.801 of 2021

¶8

Y.Linga Durai

¶9

... Petitioner/Petitioner

¶10

Vs.

¶11

Muthupradeepa ... Respondent/Respondent

¶12

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the constitution of India to direct the Family Court, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil to dispose of the petition in H.M.O.P.No.381 of 2019 within a time frame.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Mani Anandh

¶14

ORDER

¶15

[Order of the Court was made by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J. ]

¶16

We have heard Mr.P.Mani Anandh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

¶17

2.This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to dispose of H.M.O.P.No.381 of 2019 filed by the petitioner before the Family Court, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil.

¶18

3.The petitioner would state that the divorce petition has been adjourned from time to time.

¶19

4.On verification through the Registry, we find that there is no Judicial Officer manning the said Court. Therefore, we cannot issue any direction at this juncture for expeditious hearing of the petition, all that we can observe is by granting liberty to the petitioner to mention before the concerned Court as and when the Judicial Officer is posted to the Family Court.

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

1/2

¶22

C.R.P(MD)No.801 of 2021

¶23

5.With the above observation, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶24

Assistant Registrar (W)

¶25

// True Copy //

¶26

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶27

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.

¶28

¶29

1.The Judge, Family Court, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil. 2.The V.R Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶30

ORDER MADE IN C.R.P(PD)(MD)No.801 of 2021 DATED 01.06.2021

¶31

AS(11.06.2021)3P 3C

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶33

2/2

Y.Linga Durai v. Muthupradeepa

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Y.Linga Durai v. Muthupradeepa

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Murugesan Vs the State of Tamilnadu

P.Pandi, Vs K.Kavitha

B.Raman Vs the District Collector

The Chief Director Vs a.Sasika

M.v.Manopriya Vs the Director of School Education

Kanagaraj.K Vs the District Collector