Vairammal v. Velayutham
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 as the petitioner had been granted permission not to press the petition.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as not pressed; No cost.
What the court decided
C.R.P.(PD) (MD) No.408 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.12.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA C.R.P(PD) (MD)No.408 of 2020
1.Vairammal 2.Rajkumar
3.Ramkumar ... Petitioners/Petitioners/ Plaintiffs
Vs. 1.Velayutham 2.Mathiyalagan 3.Selvi 4.Rajeshwari 5.Soundhararajan ... Respondents/Respondents/ Defendants
PRAYER:- Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the fair order and decreetal order dated 19.09.2019 passed in I.A.No. 2 of 2019 in O.S.No.220 of 2017 on the file of the learned Additional District Munsif Court, Lalgudi, Trichy District by allowing this revision petition.
For Petitioners : Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian For Respondents : Mr.R.Ravindran
ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to not press this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vairammal
- petitioner
Rajkumar
- petitioner
Ramkumar
- respondent
Velayutham
- respondent
Mathiyalagan
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court