The Madurai Bench dismissed a review petition filed under Order XLVII Rules 1-2 CPC read with Section 114 CPC. The court held that no ground was made out to review the prior order dismissing a writ petition concerning property registration and arbitration disputes.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.04.2019 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
Rev.Aplw(MD)No.37 of 2019
P.Raju
... Petitioner
Vs
1.P.Muthulakshmi
2.The District Registrar, Dindigul District, Dindigul.
3.The Sub Registrar, Batlagundu, Dindigul District. ... Respondents
PRAYER: Petition filed under Order XLVII Rule 1 and 2 of CPC read with Section 114 of CPC to review the order in 25.03.2019 in W.P. (MD)No.6917 of 2018.
Prayer in WP(MD)No. 6917/ 2019 :
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a writ of Mandamus, to forbear the 2nd respondent from registering any deed of conveyance to be presented by the 3rd respondent, relating with the house plots developed in 2 Acre 92 cents in S.No.3022, 1 Acre 25 cents in S.No.3016/1, 1 Acre 32 Cents in S.No.3016/2, 48 cents in S.No.3002/1A, 3 Acres 74 cents in S.No.3015/1, 3 Acres 55 cents in S.No.3021, 1 Acre 70 cents in S.No.3017/1A and 5 Acres 3 cents in S.No.3024/2 in Genguvarpatti village, Periyakulam taluk, Theni District, till the appointment of arbitrator will be made by the Chief Justice of Madras High Court, on the basis of the partnership deed dated 01.04.2012 to resolve the dispute between the petitioner and the third respondent.
For Petitioner : Mr.Balakrishnan
for Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian For R2 and R3 : Mr.M.Murugan Government Advocate
ORDER
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ No ground has been made out for reviewing the order already passed by this Court.
2
2.This Review petition is dismissed. No costs.
Sd/Assistant Registrar (AS) / True Copy / Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
To
1.The District Registrar, Dindigul District, Dindigul.
2.The Sub Registrar, Batlagundu, Dindigul District.
Rev.Aplw(MD)No.37 of 2019 10.04.2019
ES/SP/29.04.2019/2P/3C
1 issue framed by the court
Whether sufficient grounds exist to allow the review of the previous order passed in W.P. (MD) No. 6917 of 2018?
2 provisions across 1 enactments
P. Raju
1. P. Muthulakshmi
2. The District Registrar, Dindigul District
3. The Sub Registrar, Batlagundu
G. R. Swaminathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
