Dismissed

Mohamemd Amanullah v. Davood Sahib

Madras HC11 Mar 2021CRP(MD)/2421/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 83(9) of the Wakf Act, 1995, as infructuous. The court recorded that possession of the suit property had already been handed over to the Wakf Board, leaving no substantive matter for adjudication.

What did the court decide?

Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous. Connected Misc. Petition closed. No costs.

Mohamemd Amanullah Vs Davood Sahib — Property and Title | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

C.R.P(MD)No.2421 of 2012

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 11.03.2021

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA

¶6

C.R.P(MD)No.2421 of 2012 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2012

¶7

1.Mohamed Amanullah 2.Katheeja Beevi

¶8

... Revision Petitioners/ Defendants 1 & 2

¶9

vs 1.Davood Sahib ... 1^st Respondent/Plaintiff 2.Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, Rep. by its Chief Administrative Officer, 7/4, 9^th Cross Street, Indira Nagar, Adayar, Chennai – 20. ... 2^nd Respondent/3^rd Defendant

¶10

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 83(9) of the Wakf Act, 1995, against the Judgment and Decreetal Order dated 05.07.2012 made in O.S.No.56 of 2008 passed by the Wakf Tribunal, Tirunelveli (Principal Sub-Court), Tirunelveli.

¶11

For Petitioners : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan For R – 1 : Mr.M.P.Senthil For R – 2 : Mr.K.K.Senthil

¶12

ORDER

¶13

The Civil Revision Petition is directed against the Judgment and Decreetal Order, dated 05.07.2012 made in O.S.No.56 of 2008 by the Wakf Tribunal, Tirunelveli (Principal Sub-Court), Tirunelveli.

¶14

2.The said suit was filed for recovery of possession.

¶15

3.The learned counsel appearing for the appellants as well as the learned counsel appearing for the respondents would submit that possession has already been handed over to the Wakf Board and therefore, nothing remains to be adjudicated further in the Civil Revision Petition. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

1/2

¶17

C.R.P(MD)No.2421 of 2012

¶18

4.Recording the same, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶19

Sd/-

¶20

Assistant Registrar(AS)

¶21

// True Copy //

¶22

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶23

¶24

Note :

¶25

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.

¶26

¶27

1.The Principal Sub-Court, (The Wakf Tribunal), Tirunelveli. 2.The Record Keeper, Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai( 2 copies).

¶28

C.R.P(MD)No.2421 of 2012 11.03.2021

¶29

ma(CO) TR(22.03.2021) 2P 4C

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶31

2/2

Mohamemd Amanullah v. Davood Sahib

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohamemd Amanullah v. Davood Sahib

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Sahul Hameed Vs P.Kanagaraj

Mrs.M.F.Ashma Beevi, (Died) Vs P.Habirus Ribai

R.S. Raja Kannappan Vs P. Chidambaram

K. Karuppiah Vs C. Perumal

Damodharan Vs Marichamy

Mahamayee Vs K. Muniandi