petitioner filed W.P.(MD).No.786 of 2019. This Court, by order dated 04.06.2019 directed the District Revenue Officer, Karur to consider and pass orders within a period of eight weeks. On 26.09.2019, the District Revenue Officer rejected the said application stating that the subject land is a vari promboke and water body. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner has filed W.P. (MD).No.26372 of 2019 and this Court by order dated 12.12.2019 granted an interim order of stay. Even after the grant of interim order, the first respondent made an attempt to lay drainage channel on the disputed property and hence, the petitioner filed W.P.(MD). No.14328 of 2020 and this Court by order dated 14.10.2020 granted an interim order of injunction. While so, after about 28 years of the decree in O.S.No.375 of 1991, the first respondent filed the suit in O.S.No.366 of 2020 praying to declare the decree in O.S.No.375 of 1991 as legally invalid and to grant permanent injunction, without filing a petition to set aside the exparte decree under Order 9 Rule 13 C.P.C., which is a clear abuse of process of law. As the decree in O.S.No.375 of 1991 is binding upon the first respondent, the suit in O.S.No.366 of 2020 is not at all maintainable and the same is barred by limitation. The Court below, without considering the above aspects, have erroneously taken the suit in O.S.No.366 of 2020 on file. Hence, the petitioner has come up with this revision petition.
