Charles @ Manuvel v. Titus
Case brief
What is this about?
On 30.04.2021, this Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition under Section 115 CPC as the petitioner failed to appear, despite the matter being listed for dismissal.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner to be prosecuted or petition dismissed.
What the court decided
C.R.P.(MD)(NPD)No.1580 of 2012
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 30.04.2021
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN
C.R.P.(MD)(NPD)No.1580 of 2012
Charles @ Manuvel ... Petitioner/Petitioner /1st Respondent/1st Defendant vs.
1.Titus ....1st Respondent/1st Respondent /Petitioner/Plaintiff
2.Justin Martin ...2nd Respondent/2nd Respondent /2nd Respondent/2nd Defendant
PRAYER: This Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to call for the records in unnumbered C.F.2144/2012 dated 30.03.2012 in E.P.No.28/2007 in O.S.No.116/2003 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Kuzhithurai, Kanyakumar District and to set aside the same.
For Petitioner : No appearance
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Charles @ Manuvel
- respondent
Titus
Coram
A.A.Nakkiran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court