Ganesan, v. Velayudham
Case brief
What is this about?
A civil revision petition challenging a District Munsif's order rejecting a belated application to examine the respondent's employer. The court upheld the lower court's refusal due to the four-year delay in filing the application.
What did the court decide?
No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
CRP(MD)No.1232 of 2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
RESERVED ON : 02.07.2021
PRONOUNCED ON : 09.07.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN
CRP(MD)No.1232 of 2014 MP(MD).No.1 of 2014
(Through Video Conferencing)
Ganesan ...Petitioner
Vs
Velayudham ...Respondent
Prayer:- This Civil Revision Petition has been filed, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 26.03.2014, made in IA.No.179 of 2014 in OS.No.105 of 2006, by the District Munsif, Aranthangi, Pudukkottai District.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the revision court should interfere with the lower court's refusal to reopen the case to examine a belated application filed by the plaintiff.
Whether the delay in filing the application to examine the employer's evidence warrants rejection of the reopening application.
Whether the District Munsif rightly refused to examine the Respondent's Employer.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ganesan
- respondent
Velayudham
Coram
A.A. Nakkiran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court