Mohanan v. Adington Premkumar
Case brief
What is this about?
A civil revision petition by a tenant challenging a fair order was closed by the High Court without a speaking order. The Court recorded that both parties submitted the tenant had vacated the premises and handed over keys, rendering further intervention unnecessary.
What did the court decide?
The Civil Revision Petition is closed as the petitioner has vacated the premises and handed over keys.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRP(PD)No.940 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 09.08.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE THIRU JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN
C.R.P.(PD)No.940 of 2021
and CMP No.7601 of 2021
Mohanan ... Petitioner
vs
Adington Premkumar ... Respondent
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of
India to set aside the fair and decreetal order in M.P.No.70 of 2020 in RCOP No.44 of 2017 dated 19.02.2021 on the file of Principal District Munsif cum
Rent Controller, Poonamallee.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Palniappan For Respondent : Mr.V.Lakshmi Narayanan
1/3
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether further order is necessary in the Civil Revision Petition when the petitioner has vacated the premises and handed over keys.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mohanan
- respondent
Adington Premkumar
Coram
G.CHANDRASEKHARAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court