K.R.Myilsamy v. P.Nirmala
Case brief
What is this about?
Revision petitions under Article 226 were filed to direct the District Court to entertain three interlocutory applications. The court noted the applications were already taken on file and disposed of the petitions without substantive orders.
What the court decided
C.R.P.(PD)Nos.76 to 78 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 15.04.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
C.R.P(PD).Nos.76 to 78 of 2020
and
C.M.P.No.476 of 2020
1.K.R.Myilsamy
2.Valliammai ...Petitioners
Vs
1.P.Nirmala
2.R.Ramakrishnan
3.P.Arumugam
4.The Manager,
Bank of Maharashtra
Door NO.194/1, R.G.Street,
Coimbatore – 641 001. ...Respondents
Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to issue appropriate directions to the learned III Additional District Judge, Coimbatore, to entertain the application filed by the petitioners on 03.01.2020 under I.A.Diary No.376 of 2020, I.A.Diary No.378 of 2020 and I.A.Diary No.377 of 2020 in O.S.No.378 of 2018.
1/4
C.R.P.(PD)Nos.76 to 78 of 2020
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.R.Myilsamy
- petitioner
Valliammai
- respondent
P.Nirmala
- respondent
R.Ramakrishnan
- respondent
P.Arumugam
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court