Chinnaraji v. Gunasekar
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a civil revision petition challenging the admission of Exhibit A.39, an unregistered transfer document, stating that unregistered documents can be used for collateral purposes if stamp duty and penalty are paid.
What did the court decide?
The Civil Revision Petition was dismissed, and the order of the Mahila Court dated 14.11.2019 was confirmed.
What the court decided
C.R.P. (PD) No.634 of 2020 and C.M.P. No.3301 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 27.09.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN
C.R.P. (PD) No.634 of 2020
and C.M.P. No.3301 of 2020
Chinnaraji ... Petitioner /
1 st Defendant
versus
Gunasekar ... Respondent /
Plaintiff
PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decretal order dated 14.11.2019 made in I.A.No.2 of 2019 in O.S.No.19 of 2014 on the file of the Mahila Court, Perambalur, by allowing this Civil Revision Petition.
For Petitioner : Mr.I.Gavaskar for Mr.A.Thiagarajan For Respondent : No Appearance
1/4
C.R.P. (PD) No.634 of 2020 and C.M.P. No.3301 of 2020
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the Mahila Court's order admitting Exhibit A.39 as an exhibit despite claims of non-registration and insufficient stamp duty.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Chinnaraji
- respondent
Gunasekar
Coram
G. Chandrakeswaran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court