In a Civil Revision Petition under Article 226, the Single Judge permitted the petitioner's counsel to withdraw the petition. The matter was dismissed as withdrawn, and the connected C.M.P. was closed.
Permission granted to withdraw; Civil Revision Petition dismissed as withdrawn; connected C.M.P. closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.No.3914 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 12.08.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN
C.R.P. No.3914 of 2019
and C.M.P. No.25844 of 2019
(Through Video Conference)
Irfhan @ Mahaboob Sherif .. Petitioner
Versus
M.Marappan .. Respondent
PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 14.10.2019 in I.A.No.1 of 2019 in A.S.No.91 of 2017 passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri.
For Petitioner : Mr.I.Siddiq ****** O R D E R
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.I.Siddiq, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought for the permission of this Court to withdraw this Civil Revision Petition.
G.CHANDRASEKHARAN, J.,
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ ________Page 1 of 2
________Page 1 of 2
C.R.P.No.3914 of 2019
sts
1 2.08.2021
Index :Yes / No Speaking order / Non speaking order sts
To: The Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri.
Order made in C.R.P. No.3914 of 2019
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ ________Page 2 of 2
________Page 2 of 2
Irfhan @ Mahaboob Sherif
M. Marappan
G. Chandrasekharan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
