Two civil revision petitions under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 were dismissed by the Madras High Court for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear on multiple listing dates.
Civil Revision Petitions dismissed for non-prosecution without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRP(NPD).Nos.3600 & 3601 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 23.09.2021
C O R A M
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
C.R.P.(NPD)Nos.3600 and 3601 of 2014
and M.P.No. 1 of 2014
S.R.K.P.Seinivasan ...Petitioner
in both C.R.Ps
Vs
1.P.Usman.
2.P.O.Aysha
3.C.P.Abdul Rahiman
4.C.P.Shareefa
5.T.A.M.Jeenath Shareefa ... Respondents
in C.R.P.No.3600 of 2014
(R5 impleaded as per Order dated
20.09.2013 in M.P.No.687 of
2012)
1.K.Ashok Kumar
2.P.P.Mohammed
3.T.A.M.Jeenath Shareefa ... Respondents
in C.R.P.No.3601 of 2014
(R3 impleaded as per Order dated
20.09.2013 in M.P.No.686 of
2012)
1/4
CRP(NPD).Nos.3600 & 3601 of 2014
Prayer in C.R.P.No.3600 of 2014 Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 as amended by Act 23/1973 & 1/1980, praying to call for the records in R.C.A.No.647 of 2004 and the set aside the judgment and decree dated 03.07.2014 made in R.C.A.No.647 of 2004 on the file of the Rent Control Appellate Authority (VII Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai), confirming the order and decretal order dated 16.04.2004 made in R.C.O.P.No.1277 of 2003 on the file of the XIII Judge, Rent Controller, Court of Small Causes, Chennai.
Prayer in C.R.P.No.3601 of 2014 Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 as amended by Act 23/1973 & 1/1980, praying to call for the records in R.C.A.No.648 of 2004 and the set aside the judgment and decree dated 03.07.2014 made in R.C.A.No.648 of 2004 on the file of the Rent Control Appellate Authority (VII Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai), confirming the order and decretal order dated 16.04.2004 made in R.C.O.P.No.1371 of 2003 on the file of the XIII Judge, Rent Controller, Court of Small Causes, Chennai.
In C.R.P.(NPD).No.3600 of 2014
2/4
CRP(NPD).Nos.3600 & 3601 of 2014
In C.R.P.(NPD).No.3601 of 2014
For Petitioner : No Appearance
For R3 : No Appearance
ORDER
On 18.09.2014, this Civil Revision Petition came up for admission,
thereafter, listed only on 08.09.2021, on which date, there was no representation
on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, this Court directed the Registry to list the
case under the caption “for dismissal” on 17.09.2021. Thereafter, the case is
listed today i.e on 01.10.2021. Today also there is no representation on behalf
of the petitioner, which shows that the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting the case. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to keep the matter pending any more. Hence, the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution. No
costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
01.10.2021
Index: Yes Internet:Yes Speaking order/Non Speaking Order rst
3/4
CRP(NPD).Nos.3600 & 3601 of 2014
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY,J. r st
To:
The VII Court of Small Causes, Chennai.
C.R.P.(NPD)Nos.3600 and 3601 of 2014
and M.P.No. 1 of 2014
01.10.2021
4/4
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Civil Revision Petitions should be dismissed for non-prosecution due to lack of petitioner appearance.
What is the proper disposal when the petitioner fails to appear after listing for dismissal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S.R.K.P.Seinivasan
P.Usman
P.O.Aysha
C.P.Abdul Rahiman
C.P.Shareefa
T.A.M.Jeenath Shareefa
Krishnan Ramasamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
