Disposed

Mrs.Zeenathul Rabia, v. Royapuram Dharma Brahma

Madras HC25 Mar 2021CRP/3326/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment disposed of a civil revision petition and connected miscellaneous petitions. The court noted that the parties had amicably settled the dispute via a Memorandum of Compromise dated 07.02.2017, which had been fully carried out. Consequently, the court dismissed the revision without costs.

What did the court decide?

The Civil Revision Petition is disposed; consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. No costs.

Mrs.Zeenathul Rabia, Vs Royapuram Dharma Brahma — Specific Performance | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

C.R.P. (NPD) No. 3326 of 2015

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 25.03.2021

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE P.D. AUDIKESAVALU

¶6

C.R.P. (NPD) No. 3326 of 2015
and
M.P. No. 1 of 2015
and
C.M.P. No. 7658 of 2016
Zeenathul Rabia ... Petitioner
-vs-
Royapuram Dharma Brahma Theertham Charities,
Represented by its Trustees
1. S.Ramakrishnan
2. K.S.Subramanian
3. A.S.Jayachandra Prasad

¶7

D.Sridharan

¶8

V.Sankara Narayanan ... Respondents (Names of the First and Third Respondent/Trustees are substituted by order dated 31.03.2016 in C.M.P. No. 4237 of 2016)

¶9

Prayer:- Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, praying to set aside the Judgment and Decreetal order dated 30.04.2015 in E.S. No. 14 of 2012 passed by the III Small Causes Court Judge, Chennai.

¶10

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶11

1/6

¶12

C.R.P. (NPD) No. 3326 of 2015

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr. S.Bruno Cruz

¶14

For Respondents : Ms. N.Kanthimathi

¶15

O R D E R (through video conference)

¶16

Heard Mr. S.Bruno Cruz, Learned Counsel for the Petitioner and

¶17

Ms. N.Kanthimathi, Learned Counsel for the Respondents and perused the

¶18

materials placed on record, apart from the pleadings of the parties.

¶19

It has been brought to the notice of this Court by the Learned Counsel for both sides that the matter had been referred to mediation and in the report dated 07.02.2017, it is stated that the parties have amicably settled the dispute between them and entered into Memorandum of Compromise dated 07.02.2017, which reads as follows:-

¶20

"NOW THIS MEMO OF COMPROMISE WITNESSETH AS

¶21

FOLLOWS:-

¶22

a. The Petitioner/Defendant has agreed to pay the sum of Rs.

¶23

3,500/- (Rupees Three Thousand and Five Hundred Only) as a

¶24

monthly rent in respect of the land to the Respondent/plaintiff with effect form 01.01.2013 to 31.10.2016.

¶25

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶26

2/6

¶27

C.R.P. (NPD) No. 3326 of 2015

¶28

b. The Petitioner paid the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty

¶29

Thousand only) on 01-12-2016 by Cheque No. 424220 dated 30-11-2016 drawn on Karnataka Bank, Chennai to the

¶30

Respondent/Plaintiff as refundable Caution Deposit and the Respondent/Plaintiff hereby acknowledges and accepts the receipt of the same.

¶31

c. The Petitioner/Defendant paid the sum of Rs.1,25,000/(Rupees One Lakh Twenty Five Thousand Only) as arrears of rent as on 05-01-2017 to the Respondent/Plaintiff in the manner following:i.) Rs. 53,500/- (Rupees Fifty Three Thousand and Five Hundred only) paid on 16-12-2016 by cheque No.424222 dated 14-12-2016 drawn on Karnataka

¶32

Bank, Chennai together with rent of Rs.3,500 for the month of November 2016 and

¶33

ii.) Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) paid on 02-01-2017 by cheque No.424224 dated 02-01-2017 drawn on drawn on Karnataka Bank, Chennai and

¶34

iii.) Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) paid

¶35

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶36

3/6

¶37

C.R.P. (NPD) No. 3326 of 2015

¶38

on 05-01-2017 by cheque No. 424225 dated 05-01-2017 drawn on Karnataka Bank, Chennai to the

¶39

Respondent/Plaintiff and the Respondent/Plaintiff hereby acknowledges and accepts the receipt of the

¶40

same.

¶41

d. The Petitioner paid the sum of Rs.17,500/- (Rupees Seventeen Thousand and Five Hundred only) to the Respondent/Plaintiff as refundable Advance and the Respondent/Plaintiff hereby acknowledges and accepts the receipt of the same.

¶42

e. The Respondent/Plaintiff has agreed to withdraw the E.P. No. 8 of 2015 in E.S. No. 14/202 on the file of the Registrar, Small Causes Court, Chennai and shall not proceed the Judgment and Decreetal Order dated 30-04-

¶43

2015 in E.S. No. 14/2012 against the Petitioner/Defendant.

¶44

f. The Respondent shall not interfere into the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit Schedule Property as described under this memorandum except according to law.

¶45

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶46

4/6

¶47

C.R.P. (NPD) No. 3326 of 2015

¶48

g. It is agreed that all the above named parties should bear

¶49

their own costs in the suit."

¶50

Learned Counsel for both sides submit that the aforesaid terms of compromise

¶51

have been fully carried out by the respective parties and nothing remains for further consideration in that regard. However, this would not preclude any of the parties to work out their remedies in respect of any subsequent dispute that may arise between them before the proper forum in the manner recognized by law.

¶52

Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed. Consequently, the
connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. No costs.
25.03.2021
vjt
Index: Yes/No

¶53

Note: Issue order copy by 08.04.2021. To

¶54

The III Small Causes Court, Chennai - 600 104.

¶55

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶56

5/6

¶57

C.R.P. (NPD) No. 3326 of 2015

¶58

vjt

¶59

P.D. AUDIKESAVALU, J.

¶60

C.R.P. (NPD) No. 3326 of 2015

¶61

25.03.2021

¶62

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶63

6/6

Mrs.Zeenathul Rabia, v. Royapuram Dharma Brahma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs.Zeenathul Rabia, v. Royapuram Dharma Brahma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Selvaraj Vs Radhakrishnan

K.Nandagopal Vs K.Dharman

Mcj Kannabiran Vs Bank of India

R.Devaraj Vs the Branch Manager

Nallathambi Vs Kuppusmay

S.Sumathi Vs S.Parameshwari