Dismissed

N.P.K.R.Ramasamy Co-Operative Sugar Mills Ltd, v. Binny Engineering Ltd.

Madras HC1 Dec 2021CRP/316/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a civil revision petition challenging a District Judge's order directing attachment of the petitioner's immovable properties. Holding that the executing court acted within its rights despite a pending Section 37 appeal, the Court found no grounds to interfere.

What did the court decide?

The civil revision petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution was dismissed. No costs awarded. The connected miscellaneous petition was closed.

N.P.K.R.Ramasamy Co-Operative Sugar Mills Ltd, Vs… — Execution and Attachment | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

C.R.P.(NPD).No.316 of 2020

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 01.12.2021

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN

¶6

C.R.P.(NPD).No.316 of 2020 and

¶7

C.M.P.No.1630 of 2020

¶8

N.P.K.R. Ramasamy Co-operative Sugar Mills Ltd., Thalainayar - 609 201, Ilanthope, Mayiladuthurai, Represented by its Administrator/Managing Director.

¶9

.. Petitioner

¶10

Vs.

¶11

Binny Engineering Ltd., Meenambakkam, Chennai - 600 114.

¶12

.. Respondent

¶13

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to set aside the docket order dated 18.10.2019 made in E.P.No.34 of 2013 in A.R.O.P.No.909 of 2000 and thereby, dismiss the Execution Petition in E.P.No.34 of 2013.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Bala Ramesh

¶15

For Respondent : Mr.R.Parthasarathy

¶16

1/4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

C.R.P.(NPD).No.316 of 2020

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

Challenge in this Revision is to the order of the learned District Judge, Nagapattinam made in E.P.No.34 of 2013 on 18.10.2019, directing attachment of the immovable properties belonging to the petitioner.

¶21

2. It is seen from the orders passed that the attachment has also been effected on 06.12.2019. The award was passed as early as on 16.04.2012. The application filed by the petitioner under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was also dismissed by this Court on 25.02.2021. It is stated that the appeal against the same under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is pending in OSA.No.186 of 2021. There is no stay ordered by this Court. Therefore, the executing Court was well within its rights in directing attachment of the property. The attachment has also been effected.

¶22

3. I therefore do not see any ground to interfere with the order of attachment passed by the executing Court. The Revision therefore fails and

¶23

2/4

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

C.R.P.(NPD).No.316 of 2020

¶26

it is accordingly dismissed . No costs. Consequently the connected

¶27

miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶28

01.12.2021

¶29

dsa Internet :Yes Index : No Speaking order

¶30

¶31

The District Judge, Nagapattinam.

¶32

3/4

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

C.R.P.(NPD).No.316 of 2020

¶35

R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.

¶36

dsa

¶37

C.R.P.(NPD).No.316 of 2020

¶38

01.12.2021

¶39

4/4

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

N.P.K.R.Ramasamy Co-Operative Sugar Mills Ltd, v. Binny Engineering Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

N.P.K.R.Ramasamy Co-Operative Sugar Mills Ltd, v. Binny Engineering Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G.Divyabharathi Vs Arun Narayanan

M.P.Poornima Vs K.Muilmurugan

Thiripura Sundari Vs M.Chandrasekaran

S.Velu Vs K.Rajavel

Angamuthu Vs Dhandapani

D.Shanmugam Vs P.Anbalagan