In a civil revision petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution, the petitioner sought to set aside a docket order. The petition was subsequently withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel with an endorsement in court. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and closed the connected miscellaneous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(NPD).No.2886 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 17.12.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
C.R.P.(NPD).No.2886 of 2021
and
C.M.P.No.20824 of 2021
Kumarasamy
.. Petitioner
Vs.
1.Santhana Mudaliar 2.V.Pachiappan 3.Ulaganathan .. Respondents
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to set aside the docket order (Return order) order of the learned District Munsif, Kancheepuram made in unnumbered I.A.Sr.No.3312 of 2021 in O.S.No.29 of 1966 dated 23.11.2021 and consequently to direct the learned District Munsif, Kancheepuram to number the I.A.Sr.No.3312 of 2021 in O.S.No.29 of 1966.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.K.Kabir, Senior Counsel for Mr.R.Bhagawat Krishna *********
1/2
C.R.P.(NPD).No.2886 of 2021
O R D E R
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.
dsa
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to
withdraw this Civil Revision Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2. In view of the submission and endorsement made by the counsel for the petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
17.12.2021
dsa Index : No Non-Speaking order To
The District Munsif, Kancheepuram.
C.R.P.(NPD).No.2886 of 2021
2/2
Kumarasamy
Santhana Mudaliar
V. Pachiappan
Ulaganathan
R. Subramanian
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court