seen that the interim maintenance payable to her is not complied with even though there were directions of the Courts below to the husband-respondent. Under such circumstances, despite the wife-petitioner has not received the amount of Rs.10,000/- every month as interim maintenance from her husband-respondent from the month of April 2011, till as on date, the wife petitioner can get alternative remedy by approaching the Court below seeking for a direction to her husband to pay the interim maintenance of Rs.10,000/- every month. Apart from that the wife-petitioner cannot seek stay in further proceedings in the main HMOP No.4193 of 2010 for not paying the interim maintenance to her. Further, the unnumbered I.A is closed as infructuous as there is no further adjudication while the petitioner has represented that the application will not be pressed. However, even the main HMOP. No.4193 of 2010 is of the year 2010, the litigation between the parties are prolonging till now and two sons of them are studying in the Colleges, this Court directs the Court below to proceed with the Trial on the next hearing and complete it as expeditiously as possible and dispose the case within a period of Six months from the date of receipt of copy of this Order. Further, as it is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that HMOP No.2690 of 2019 which was also filed for conjugal rights is also pending and the same shall be tried together along with this HMOP No.4193 of 2010.
