Dismissed

R. Thiruvenkadam v. M. Karthiga

Madras HC9 Dec 2021CRP/2777/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 to reject a petition, distinguishing the case based on Supreme Court jurisprudence that prohibits writ jurisdiction when civil remedies are available. The Court dismissed the revision with liberty to approach the District Court for rejection.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to approach the District Court seeking rejection of the pleadings.

R. Thiruvenkadam Vs M. Karthiga — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

CRP (PD) No. 2777 of 2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 09.12.2021

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN

¶6

CRP (PD) No.2777 of 2021 and

¶7

CMP No.20187 of 2021

¶8

R.Thiruvenkadam ... Petitioner/Respondent

¶9

¶10

M.Karthiga ... Respondent/Petitioner

¶11

PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to reject the petition by strike out pleadings in petition filed along within G.W.O.P.No. 134 of 2020 on the file of the Hon'ble Principal District Court, Vellore, as the petition is devoid of merits and a frivolous fictitious one on the file of the Hon'ble Principal District Court, Vellore.

¶12

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr. M.Velmurugan

¶14

O R D E R

¶15

The respondent in G.W.O.P.No. 134 of 2020 on the file of the

¶16

1/4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

CRP (PD) No. 2777 of 2021

¶19

Principal District Court, Vellore, has come up with this Revision invoking the supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to reject the petition in the said GWOP.

¶20

2. Though several grounds have been urged, I do not entertain this Revision in view of the Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in 2019 9 SCC 538 ( Virudhunagar Hindu Nadargal Dharma Paribalana Sabai &

¶21

Ors. Vs. Tuticorin Educational Society & Ors) , wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has pointed out that exercise of power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India should be avoided as a matter of discipline and prudence when a remedy under the Civil Procedure is available.

¶22

3 . In view of the same, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed

¶23

with liberty to the petitioner to move the District Court seeking rejection. No

¶24

costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶25

Vsg 09.12.2021

¶26

Index: Yes/No Speaking order / Non speaking order

¶27

To:

¶28

2/4

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

CRP (PD) No. 2777 of 2021

¶31

District Court, Vellore.

¶32

2.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madras High Court, Chennai.

¶33

3/4

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

CRP (PD) No. 2777 of 2021

¶36

R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.

¶37

Vsg

¶38

CRP (PD) No.2777 of 2021 and CMP No.20187 of 2021

¶39

09.12.2021

¶40

4/4

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

R. Thiruvenkadam v. M. Karthiga

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R. Thiruvenkadam v. M. Karthiga

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nivetha Vs C.Sivakumar

C.R.Naveen Vs Mohammed Anwar

Vijaya Vs Venkatesan

Haridass Vs Vasanthi

V.Nirmala Devi Vs Srinivasan

Kathiravan Vs Zaheer Ussain