M.Sundararaj v. T.Soundarajan
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner tenant vacated the property, rendering the Civil Revision Petition infructuous. The High Court dismissed the petition as没有人对用户提供的输入有任何反应，无法访问任何外部数据源或知识。
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as infructuous due to vacated property; connected CM.P. closed.
What the court decided
C.R.P.(NPD).No.2281 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 24.06.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA
C.R.P.(NPD).No.2281 of 2016 and C.M.P.No.11805 of 2016 MSundararaj ... Petitioner/Respondent/Tenant Vs. T.Soundarajan ... Respondent/Petitioner/Land Lord
PRAYER : The Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Building (Lease & Rent) Control Act As amended, against the order and decreetal order in R.C.A.No.481 of 2007 by the Appellate Authority, VIII Small Causes Court, Chennai, dated 07.10.2014, confirming the order and decreetal order in R.C.O.P.No. 1682 of 2005 by the learned Rent Controller, XVI Small Causes Court Chennai dated 28.03.2007.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Elango For Respondents : Mr.T.Soundarajan
ORDER
(Heard through video conferencing) When the matter is taken up for hearing, Learned counsel for the petitioner
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Civil Revision Petition remains maintainable post-occupation termination.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MSundararaj
- respondent
T.Soundarajan
Coram
R.N.MANJULA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court